http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b2b8f9f8
sorry, it's in german. I'll translate some bits:
Sombody went to Torrent trackers and announced blog.fefe.de:443 as
Torrent client (for a really popular download I guess).
Thus, blog.fefe.de:443 got flooded with torrent-client traffic on the
SSL port.
Port 25
Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs
---
This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've never had a
problem sending out on port 25, even on home
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:02 +0100, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs
--
This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've
never had a problem sending out on port 25, even
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs
This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've
never had a problem sending out on port 25, even on home residental
ISPs :)
Any ISP that does *not* block port 25 for residential service is a part
of
- Original Message
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 5:00:16 AM
Subject: Is such an SSL attack possible against Postfix?
http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b2b8f9f8
sorry, it's in german. I'll translate some bits
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs
This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've
never had a problem sending out on port 25, even on home residental
ISPs :)
Any ISP that does *not* block port 25 for residential service is a part
of
On 2010-07-21 Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 5:00:16 AM
Subject: Is such an SSL attack possible against Postfix?
http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b2b8f9f8
sorry, it's in german. I'll translate
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net:
The issue with this attack is that it might exhaust CPU resources on the
server without having to saturate the bandwidth, due to cryptographic
operations required by SSL.
Correct.
And that it seems to use BitTorrent as a
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Any ISP that does *not* block port 25 for residential service is a part
of the spam/zombie problem, and if yours doesn't, you should complain,
loudly if necessary, and encourage them to block it.
Every ISP in the UK?
Every one that is not, at a bare minimum, closely
I beg to disagree. Blocking port 25 is a violation of Net Neutrality.
Ridiculous, net neutrality has nothing to do with service level
agreements. Residential service does not in any way, shape or form
equate to requiring full SMTP services to be able to run your own full
blown mail server, nor
On 2010-07-21 11:16 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
If you want that level of service, upgrade to a service that
provides it, and that will be at least minimally monitored for
abuse (it is in the ISPs best interest to avoid getting their IP
addresses on blacklists).
Absolute
Charles Marcus put forth on 7/21/2010 7:46 AM:
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs
This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've
never had a problem sending out on port 25, even on home residental
ISPs :)
Any ISP that does *not*
12 matches
Mail list logo
