On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:27:59 +
James Griffin articulated:
> [- Thu 14.Mar'13 at 12:07:14 -0400 Kris Deugau :-]
>
> > Jerry wrote:
> > > Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For
> > > relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use
> > > Dovecot an
[- Thu 14.Mar'13 at 12:07:14 -0400 Kris Deugau :-]
> Jerry wrote:
> > Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For relatively
> > fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
> > what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in
On 03/14/2013 05:07 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>> Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For relatively
>> fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
>> what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
>> decade.
>
> Sieve
Am 14.03.2013 21:31, schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> usually sieve comes AFTER SpamAssassin because it is a broken
>> setup using a POST queue filter because it results in become
>> a backscatter and you are usually not permitted by law
>> accept a message with "250 OK" and drop it
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
>> Sieve can't call outside programs (eg SpamAssassin) by design. IMO the
>> inability to call any external filtering programs (even from a
>> restricted whitelist) makes overall mail filtering significantly harder
By "harder" I mea
Am 14.03.2013 21:04, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> On 2013-03-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
>>> Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For
relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot
and Sieve.
On 2013-03-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
>> Jerry wrote:
>>> Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For
>>> relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot
>>> and Sieve. From what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been
>>
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Jerry wrote:
>> Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For relatively
>> fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
>> what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
>> decade.
>
> Siev
Jerry wrote:
> Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For relatively
> fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
> what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
> decade.
Sieve can't call outside programs (eg SpamAssassin) by des
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses "procmail". For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
I realize this gets away from Postfix per
Στις , Jerry έγραψε:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:44:26 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan articulated:
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email
however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with
Thanks guys, i am using dovecot but i didn't knew in technical term we
call it LDA :P. but i thought procmail delivers emails to the
user-folder only, which i misunderstood , if dovecot, procmail and
courier are LDAs as i perceive from you emails. so no problem in
understanding the functionality of
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:44:26 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan articulated:
> i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
> that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
> i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
> system user a
On 3/14/2013 4:44 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
> that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
> i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
> system user and virtual users wit
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
system user and virtual users with no issue. it receive email and drop
it to virtual user d
15 matches
Mail list logo
