Victor Duchovni Victor.Duchovni at morganstanley.com writes:
Wietse, if I understand correctly, wants to ensure that the issue is
clearly defined, so we don't solve the wrong one, and is worth fixing.
Naturally.
Why does your Dovecot intermittently SIGBUS?
It doesn't. The deliver binary was
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the more extreme route (of altering working code).
I believe the code is not working as
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:10:32PM +, Thomas Arnett wrote:
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the more extreme route (of
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:10:32PM +, Thomas Arnett wrote:
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the
On 07/14/2010 01:27 AM, Thomas Arnett wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7: /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver)
postfix/pipe[15173]: A481A3B:
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7:
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7:
HISTORY, 20061207:
Compatibility with Postfix 2.3: undo the change to bounce
instead of defer after pipe-to-command delivery fails with
a signal. File: global/pipe_command.c.
Part 1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/154616
Part 2 (tested with Postfix 2.6.6):
---
Thomas Arnett:
HISTORY, 20061207:
Compatibility with Postfix 2.3: undo the change to bounce
instead of defer after pipe-to-command delivery fails with
a signal. File: global/pipe_command.c.
Part 1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/154616
Part 2 (tested with
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with signal 7:
/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver)
11 matches
Mail list logo