Michael Ströder wrote:
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Google does support SMTPUTF8 :
$ host -t mx gmail.com
gmail.com mail is handled by 20 alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com mail
HI!
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to
libicu I assume that SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely used.
How about other
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:01:48 +0200, Mark Martinec stated:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Google does support SMTPUTF8 :
$ host -t mx gmail.com
gmail.com mail
Michael Str?der:
HI!
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to
libicu I assume that SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely used.
* on the Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
What mail products are SMTPUTF8-compliant at this time?
will it ever be needed ?, with idn domains it allready encoded into 7bit,
is postfix translate this to utf8 ?, dont know here since thunderbird works
with idn domains
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Michael Str?der:
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to
libicu I assume that
Michael Str?der:
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Michael Str?der:
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to
On August 20, 2015 2:48:33 PM wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to
libicu I
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Michael Str?der:
So I interpret your question it as an answer:
SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely used. ;-)
10 years ago, IPv6 implementation was driven by the concern that
everyone was going to suffer from unavailable IP addresses.
SMTPUTF8 is a
Zitat von Mike Cardwell post...@lists.grepular.com:
* on the Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
What mail products are SMTPUTF8-compliant at this time?
will it ever be needed ?, with idn domains it allready encoded into 7bit,
is postfix translate this to utf8 ?,
10 matches
Mail list logo