Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-04 Thread Michael Grimm
Dan Mahoney wrote >> Here's an SMTP DANE validator that I use when I make changes to my server. >> https://dane.sys4.de/ >> >> I'm not sure if it is just what you're looking for, though. > > No, I am looking for a server to which I can send mail to make sure DANE is > being looked up and used

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 09:47:44AM -0800, Dan Mahoney wrote: > Also...the server I'm sending to has a legit signed cert that matches > its hostname, so the message I get is: > > Trusted TLS connection established to prime.gushi.org[149.20.68.142]:25: > TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-G

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Christian Kivalo
On 2022-01-03 23:02, Dan Mahoney wrote: On Jan 3, 2022, at 1:46 PM, Mike wrote: On 1/3/2022 2:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: [snip] One more question: Does anyone know of a "reflector" like service that one can use to test DANE validation, i.e. a site that one is allowed to send test me

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Mahoney
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 1:46 PM, Mike wrote: > > On 1/3/2022 2:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: >> [snip] >> >> One more question: Does anyone know of a "reflector" like service that one >> can use to test DANE validation, i.e. a site that one is allowed to send >> test messages to, that *onl

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Mike
On 1/3/2022 2:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: >[snip] > > One more question: Does anyone know of a "reflector" like service that one > can use to test DANE validation, i.e. a site that one is allowed to send > test messages to, that *only* has DANE as the trust mech (so, say, a > self-signed

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022, Dan Mahoney wrote: This is a problem when your local resolver is slaving the root zone, as a standard root zone "type slave" will hand . NS out with the AA bit set, but will not set the AD bit. There's a feature in more recent versions of BIND (mirror zones) that may fix

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Dan Mahoney: > > If you enable DNSSEC lookups, Postfix will log a warning when the root > > zone appears unsigned. See: > > > >http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#dnssec_probe > > > >This feature is available in Postfix 3.6 and later. It was > >backported to Postfix versions 3.5.9

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Mahoney
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:49:05AM -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > >> We run validating resolvers at the day job, but by default not on the box >> where postfix runs. (I.e. we rely on the AD bit). > > "Relying in the AD bit" i

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:49:05AM -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > We run validating resolvers at the day job, but by default not on the box > where postfix runs. (I.e. we rely on the AD bit). "Relying in the AD bit" is independent of whether the validating resolver is local or remote. How

Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Hey there, We run validating resolvers at the day job, but by default not on the box where postfix runs. (I.e. we rely on the AD bit). In reading over what's required to enable DANE support in postfix, I see that there's a compile-time requirement for the DNS lib in the OS to support it, wh