Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-21 Thread Mikael Bak
/dev/rob0 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote: >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: >>> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info and enters

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-21 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote: > > Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: > > > > > >> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does > > >> his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info > > >> and

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-21 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote: > Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: > > > >> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does > >> his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info > >> and enters the website, don't

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-21 Thread Mikael Bak
Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: > >> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does his/her job and scans >> the logs, finds your assistance info and enters the website, don't you think >> the same admin is also able to write a mail to you (postmas

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-20 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:33:06PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: > > > Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does his/her > > job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info and enters the > > website, don't you think the same admin

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner: > Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does his/her job and scans > the logs, finds your assistance info and enters the website, don't you think > the same admin is also able to write a mail to you (postmaster@...)? Because if his se

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-20 Thread Christian Roessner
Hi, >> Off topic, but on this subject, I am planning to implement this with >> a web page, and maybe a contact form. Does anyone have a preferred >> simple and yet spam-resistant means of doing this? Ideally I'd like >> something that's more blind-friendly than Captcha. > > I dislike graphic capt

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-20 Thread Mark Goodge
On 19/01/2011 15:04, /dev/rob0 wrote: Off topic, but on this subject, I am planning to implement this with a web page, and maybe a contact form. Does anyone have a preferred simple and yet spam-resistant means of doing this? Ideally I'd like something that's more blind-friendly than Captcha. I

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-20 Thread Mikael Bak
/dev/rob0 wrote: > http://nospam4.nodns4.us/ > The "Alternate media" stuff is like accepting that spam has made email impossible to rely on for communication. Antispam made right can actually make email work again as it once did. Mikael

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:15:48PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * /dev/rob0 : > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:46:42PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance > > > caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| > > > > A

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-19 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* /dev/rob0 : > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:46:42PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance > > caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| > > Are these issues that you're able to help them with? Strictly speaking: If the

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:46:42PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance > caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| Are these issues that you're able to help them with? > So users do read. Off topic, but on this subje

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-11 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt : smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| Uh, what *kind* of tickets??? So users do read. Most of the times, but its really hard to follow their wooly thoughts... Regards Andre

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-11 Thread John Adams
Am 11.01.2011 21:50, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: * John Adams: drop the technical gibberish and suddenly people understand you :) Hey, I didn't drop that, I just added one line :) Now, if you replace the technical gibberish by something people understand you will get less tickets :) The lin

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* John Adams : > drop the technical gibberish and suddenly people understand you :) Hey, I didn't drop that, I just added one line :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Be

Re: Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-11 Thread John Adams
Am 11.01.2011 21:46, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| So users do read. drop the technical gibberish and suddenly people understand you :)

Success story: smtpd_reject_footer

2011-01-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :| So users do read. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-