Suppress Command died with status 1 in Pipe transport

2010-06-18 Thread Adam
Good Morning, Is there a way to hide the syserr as well as the path returned by a pipe transport? For instance, I have virtual accounts and they are handled by a custom transport. When a message is sent to a non-existent user, the mailer-daemon response to the sender is: b...@example.com:

Re: Suppress Command died with status 1 in Pipe transport

2010-06-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Adam: Good Morning, Is there a way to hide the syserr as well as the path returned by a pipe transport? For instance, I have virtual accounts and they are handled by a custom transport. When a message is sent to a non-existent user, the mailer-daemon response to the sender is:

Re: Suppress Command died with status 1 in Pipe transport

2010-06-18 Thread Adam
Wietse: Thank you for the reply. Rest assured this was specifically for SASL authenticated users. Non-authenticated users would have had an unknown recipient rejected by the policy service. I solved the issue by setting up virtual_mailbox_maps. My primary reason for wanting to avoid that was

Re: Suppress Command died with status 1 in Pipe transport

2010-06-18 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:01:14AM -0500, Adam wrote: Good Morning, Is there a way to hide the syserr as well as the path returned by a pipe transport? For instance, I have virtual accounts and they are handled by a custom transport. When a message is sent to a non-existent user, the