John Levine skrev den 2013-10-10 21:17:
I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually used
that
domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string in a message)q
has
been really spammy.
I asked. There really is a domain master.cf, and it really is used
in URLs in a lot of spa
Stan Hoeppner skrev den 2013-10-10 12:06:
I tend to agree. SA has a poor FP track record here.
sa 3.4 rc3 is just relaesed today but is the problem that sa uses
headers to make uribl check on ?
imho email headers should not trick urls testing, but none have fixed
it yet
Daniele Nicolodi skrev den 2013-10-10 11:27:
I guess there is not much we can do about it, but I found it funny.
# local.cf
uridnsbl_skip_domain main.cf master.cf
On 10/10/2013 2:17 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually used that
>> domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string in a message)q has
>> been really spammy.
>
> I asked. There really is a domain master.cf,
> and it really is used
> in URLs
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:17:12PM -, John Levine wrote:
> >I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually
> >used that domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string
> >in a message)q has been really spammy.
>
> I asked. There really is a domain master.cf, and it really is
>I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actually used that
>domain in a URL (as opposed to just a random string in a message)q has
>been really spammy.
I asked. There really is a domain master.cf, and it really is used
in URLs in a lot of spam.
Solution: don't look up strings in the
>> Content inspection is evil by-design and doomed to fail. This is just
>> another example.
Unfortunately, there's no alternative unless your users don't care
about getting mail from large providers with the occasional spam
infestation.
I suspect either it's just a mistake, or stuff that actuall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 10.10.2013 12:06, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 10/10/2013 4:30 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>
>> Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list
>>> being marked as possible spam by
On 10/10/2013 4:30 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
>> as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
>> problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started
Zitat von Daniele Nicolodi :
Hello,
recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started to list master.cf as a
"bad" hostname. Mails directed to the postfi
Hello,
recently I've see some emails from the postfix mailing list being marked
as possible spam by Spamassassin. Investigating which rule caused the
problem I found that dbl.spamhaus.org started to list master.cf as a
"bad" hostname. Mails directed to the postfix list of course contain
the stri
11 matches
Mail list logo
