On 08/30/2013 02:49 PM, John Levine wrote:
submission 587/udp
I've been doing this for a long time, and I've never seen anyone try
to do SMTP over anything other than TCP.
You'll see this for a lot of services in the file. The old practice was
for IANA to assign both tcp and udp when
) could improve
immensely.
T
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Friday, 30 August 2013 12:15 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check
As attachments get larger, and end users use email rather than ftp for file
transfer for convenience sake, a UDP implementation, perhaps using UDP as a
data streaming channel could become a very useful configuration, and the
transfer speed over high latency links (think satellite etc) could
On Aug 30, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
As attachments get larger, and end users use email rather than ftp for file
transfer for convenience sake, a UDP implementation, perhaps using UDP as a
data streaming channel could become a very useful configuration, and the
transfer
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Jan P. Kessler
Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 12:21 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Glenn English
Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 12:52 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]
On Aug 30, 2013
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Glenn English
Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 12:52 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]
On Aug 30, 2013
On 8/30/2013 10:12 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
I am not talking about implementing SMTP on UDP, I am taking about the
possibility of adding a side-channel for bulk data that would use UDP.
I'm really surprised nobody has mentioned this yet. It seems there's a
far simpler solution to the
On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:59 PM +0900 peter evans pe...@ixp.jp wrote:
Combine these two into one. put permit_sasl_ at the top
as it is a first match wins thing. And of course, re-educate
your client that auth
Am 29.08.2013 21:34, schrieb Glenn English:
I'm under the impression that 587 is to be used by my local users
(email clients to local MTA), and 25 is used by MTA-MTA. Is this wrong?
correct
And /etc/services says:
auth 113/tcp authentication tap ident
not 587...
grep
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:37 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 29.08.2013 21:34, schrieb Glenn English:
I'm under the impression that 587 is to be used by my local users
(email clients to local MTA), and 25 is used by MTA-MTA. Is this wrong?
correct
And /etc/services says:
auth
On 29 Aug 2013, at 13:34 , Glenn English g...@slsware.com wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:59 PM +0900 peter evans pe...@ixp.jp
wrote:
Combine these two into one. put permit_sasl_ at the top
as it is a first
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep 587 /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
That's what mine says too. Does Postfix accept UDP submissions?
I looked at RFC6409 (the newest I could find on 587), and all it said was port
587 -- the protocol isn't
There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe reserved for
future use?
t
From: Glenn Englishmailto:g...@slsware.com
Sent: 29/08/2013 3:44 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.orgmailto:postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port
On 8/29/2013 3:43 PM, Glenn English wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep 587 /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
That's what mine says too. Does Postfix accept UDP submissions?
I looked at RFC6409 (the newest I could find on 587), and
On 08/30/2013 08:53 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe reserved
for future use?
No, it's just the assignment from IANA. In the past when either a TCP
or UDP port assignment was requested both were assigned, this does not
mean that there is
submission 587/udp
I've been doing this for a long time, and I've never seen anyone try
to do SMTP over anything other than TCP.
Regards,
John Levine, postmas...@cauce.org, CAUCE postmaster
http://www.cauce.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
