On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:43 -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:29 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/24/2010 10:24 AM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
We have a few companies that we need have ALL email traffic encrypted.
We can no longer 'blindly trust' the end user to not include
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:41:47PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
Concerning outbound email to a specific domain that I need encrypted, I
use smtp_tls_policy_maps. I would like some level of verification that
the remote server IS the server I think it is. I see the
smtp_tls_security_level as
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:47 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:41:47PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
Concerning outbound email to a specific domain that I need encrypted, I
use smtp_tls_policy_maps. I would like some level of verification that
the remote server IS
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:30:24PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
The choice between fingerprint and secure depends on whether the
remote cert is self-signed and stable, or signed public CA and changes
each time it expires.
OK - so i get them to send me their cert file - then create a
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:29 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/24/2010 10:24 AM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
We have a few companies that we need have ALL email traffic encrypted.
We can no longer 'blindly trust' the end user to not include sensitive
information in email. A VPN would be a easier
