Re: postfix 2.3.x vs postfix 2.6 stable

2009-10-13 Thread Mikael Bak
Zhang Huangbin wrote: On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver. Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ? As i know,

Re: postfix 2.3.x vs postfix 2.6 stable

2009-10-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Zhang Huangbin: On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver. Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ? As i know,

Re: postfix 2.3.x vs postfix 2.6 stable

2009-10-13 Thread Eero Volotinen
Zhang Huangbin kirjoitti: On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver. Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ? As i know,

postfix 2.3.x vs postfix 2.6 stable

2009-10-09 Thread Eero Volotinen
I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver. Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ? -- Eero

Re: postfix 2.3.x vs postfix 2.6 stable

2009-10-09 Thread Wietse Venema
Eero Volotinen: I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver. Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ? You can use Postfix 2.3 until one of the following happens: 1) You need