Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-08 Thread Rich Wales
Another thing I think I see about postscreen is that it apparently will only look up IP addresses. There doesn't seem to be any postscreen_rhsbl_sites feature (which might allow me to move my current reject_rhsbl_client and permit_rhswl_client checks into postscreen). Is such a thing planned,

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/8/2011 12:05 PM, Rich Wales wrote: Another thing I think I see about postscreen is that it apparently will only look up IP addresses. There doesn't seem to be any postscreen_rhsbl_sites feature (which might allow me to move my current reject_rhsbl_client and permit_rhswl_client checks into

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-08 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:05:05AM -0700, Rich Wales wrote: Another thing I think I see about postscreen is that it apparently will only look up IP addresses. There doesn't seem to be any postscreen_rhsbl_sites feature (which might allow me to move my current reject_rhsbl_client and

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Wales: Another thing I think I see about postscreen is that it apparently will only look up IP addresses. There doesn't seem to be any postscreen_rhsbl_sites feature (which might allow me to move my current reject_rhsbl_client and permit_rhswl_client checks into postscreen). Is such a

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-07 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Rich Wales ri...@richw.org: If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-07 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Rich Wales ri...@richw.org: value from a given list. (I won't go into the details, they would be off-topic here, but it's nice to have this capability.) It will probably start a flamewar, but I personally am interested in your particular weights on the different RBLs -- Ralf Hildebrandt

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Wales: Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests, so that it does not repeat every test for every connection. This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters. Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would, of course, be

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-07 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:03:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Note the following difference. postscreen caches that the client IS NOT listed in DNSBL. It doesn't cache clients that are listed. DNS servers cache that the client IS listed in DNSBL. They don't cache non-existent DNSBL

postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Rich Wales
If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be redundant? Rich Wales

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/06/2011 10:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote: If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/6/2011 5:34 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 06/06/2011 10:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote: If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Rich Wales
On the interfaces and ports that postscreen(8) passes mail to, yes. Do note that the behaviour is different; you will be able to directly transplant your reject_rbl_client RBLs to postscreen, but postscreen has many more options available, such as checking for exact return values, and scoring

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Wales: If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be redundant? Almost.

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Rich Wales
Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests, so that it does not repeat every test for every connection. This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters. Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would, of course, be transparent to Postfix and

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites vs. reject_rbl_client

2011-06-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Wales: Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests, so that it does not repeat every test for every connection. This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters. Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would, of course, be