Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Simon Morvan put forth on 10/31/2009 12:30 PM:
And why shouldn't be able to use my own mail server behind my private
residential ADSL line ?
You should be able to. Here's how to implement the outbound mail
portion to prevent mass rejections:
Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
That's prevent rejection but also prevent my ability to ensure my
freedom to use the network :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality
That's will be my last message on-list for this topic but feel free to
keep on discuss this off-list
- Original Message
From: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 1:00:30 PM
Subject: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
That's prevent rejection but also prevent
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:00:30 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com replied:
[snip]
Net Neutrality has nothing to do with SMTP receivers. It has
everything to do with network carriers and QOS. You have no inherent
right to send email to _my_ MX, nor anyone else's. Your rights end
where
Daniel V. Reinhardt a écrit :
- Original Message
From: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 1:00:30 PM
Subject: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
Simon Morvan put forth on 11/1/2009 4:20 AM:
That's
- Original Message
From: Simon Morvan gar...@zone84.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 2:37:14 PM
Subject: Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions evaluation question
Daniel V. Reinhardt a écrit :
- Original Message
From: Stan Hoeppner
Simon Morvan a écrit :
Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
[snip]
Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
which has been very effective here.
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL
On Sunday 01 November 2009 12:24:54 mouss wrote:
Simon Morvan a écrit :
Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
[snip]
Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
which has been very effective here.
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Simon Morvan wrote:
[blah blah]
And how am I supposed to send mail from my own mail server if I
don't trust my ISP mail relay nor have $$$ to have a colo space and
my own IP space ?
And, Stan, you refuse mails from my ISP mail relay... (the second
biggest in
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
On Sunday 01 November 2009 12:24:54 mouss wrote:
Simon Morvan a écrit :
Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
[snip]
Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
which has been very effective here.
The last time I tried it, Zen included too
Mikael Bak a écrit :
Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Mikael Bak wrote:
Simon Morvan wrote:
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL is a bit too restrictive. Maybe it
changed, I'll give it another try.
Simon Morvan put forth on 10/31/2009 12:30 PM:
And why shouldn't be able to use my own mail server behind my private
residential ADSL line ?
You should be able to. Here's how to implement the outbound mail
portion to prevent mass rejections:
Hello folks,
I've got some checks setup like that :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
Simon Morvan:
I notice that event if the recipient address doesn't exists, the
check_policy_service (greylist) got evaluated, causing higher load than
needed. Isn't reject_unauth_destination there to block inexistent
recipients ?
No, that's what reject_unlisted_recipient is for.
--
On Friday 30 October 2009 09:52:44 Simon Morvan wrote:
Hello folks,
I've got some checks setup like that :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
permit_mynetworks,
Le 30/10/2009 16:05, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
On Friday 30 October 2009 09:52:44 Simon Morvan wrote:
Hello folks,
I've got some checks setup like that :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
Simon Morvan wrote:
Consider Zen here. It also incorporates the (not-quite-so) new PBL,
which has been very effective here.
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL is a bit too restrictive. Maybe it
changed, I'll give it
Markus Schönhaber put forth on 10/30/2009 10:05 AM:
Simon Morvan:
I notice that event if the recipient address doesn't exists, the
check_policy_service (greylist) got evaluated, causing higher load than
needed. Isn't reject_unauth_destination there to block inexistent
recipients ?
No,
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 10/30/2009 2:23 PM:
I don't have reject_unauth_destination. I guess which parameter one
needs to implement depends on whether one uses local deliver?
Should have proofread that... I meant I do not have
reject_unlisted_recipient defined. However, the docs say it's
Stan Hoeppner:
I only have reject_unauth_destination on my relay-only server, and
sending to an invalid recipient address returns:
550 5.1.1 inva...@domain.tld: Recipient address rejected: User unknown
in relay recipient table
I don't have reject_unauth_destination. I guess which
On 10/30/2009 2:28 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 10/30/2009 2:23 PM:
I don't have reject_unauth_destination. I guess which parameter one
needs to implement depends on whether one uses local deliver?
Should have proofread that... I meant I do not have
Simon Morvan put forth on 10/30/2009 10:39 AM:
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL is a bit too restrictive. Maybe it
changed, I'll give it another try.
Would you please elaborate a bit on this? Most of the listings in PBL
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Mikael Bak wrote:
Simon Morvan wrote:
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL is a bit too restrictive. Maybe it
changed, I'll give it another try.
Can you please tell me why an ADSL user would send
Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Mikael Bak wrote:
Simon Morvan wrote:
The last time I tried it, Zen included too many legitimate users behind
ADSL lines. The Policy behind PBL is a bit too restrictive. Maybe it
changed, I'll give it another try.
Can you please tell me why an ADSL
24 matches
Mail list logo