On 09/07/2013 05:19 AM, FliedRice wrote:
Just a thought, In order to block more incoming spam you could add more rbl's
to your main.cf file.
I have spamassassin, but it's turned off in favor of the following smtpd
restrictions and domain blocking
in the plesk user interface, or filtering in the C
for Birthdays, Christmas , holidays, Valentines , Love , & just
because!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/spam-headers-from-ME-to-ME-but-different-anvelope-sender-tp61232p61250.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 9/6/2013 9:05 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wijatmoko U. Prayitno:
>> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
>> wiseadmin wrote:
>>
>>> and the same message from postfix logs:
>>>
>>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
>>> uid=1018 from=
>> The email came from
All emails are reveived through smtp and then they are passed to
spamd, inspected and delivered.
If I say something stupid, please excuse me, I am experienced with
linux and networking in general bun not to postfix and email
servers.
I sent an email to myself and
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
>>> uid=1018 from=
>> The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
>
> Good observation. This message did not come via
I installed SA last week and I started to reveive these spams 1-2 months
ago.
# netstat -tupan | grep spam
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
27752/spamd.pid
What tests should I do next?
This is a production server, I'am starting to become afraid.
What was t
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 21:10 +0700, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>
> >>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]:
> >>> A3E8C10BADF: uid=1018 from=
> >> The email came from local user uid
Wijatmoko U. Prayitno:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
> wiseadmin wrote:
>
> > and the same message from postfix logs:
> >
> > /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
> > uid=1018 from=
> The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
Good o
Ok, this is a solution. I tried to avoid this because it consumes some
resources.
I have problems ONLY with this specific spam.
I try to find out if there is something like this:
- reject all emails that come from a different server to my server and
have the From: header a local address (on my
And what does it mean?
uid 1018 is the user under witch spamd runs.
#grep 1018 /etc/passwd
spamd:x:1018:1019::/home/spamd:/bin/bash
I don't know how to interpret the fact that is comes from pickup
service. Is my server compromised?
Thanks.
On 09/06/2013 04:51 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
wiseadmin wrote:
> and the same message from postfix logs:
>
> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
> uid=1018 from=
The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
--
WUP
wiseadmin:
> I have a postfix server for
> many years. The anti-spam filters were ok, I got in general just a
> couple of spams per day.
>
> Since a month or so, I start getting
> more than 100 spams for every user on a specific account/domain
> per
>
Hello,
I have a postfix server for
many years. The anti-spam filters were ok, I got in general just a
couple of spams per day.
Since a month or so, I start getting
more than 100 spams for every user on a specific account/domain
per
da
13 matches
Mail list logo
