Re: Upgraded to 3.4 today. All logging has Stopped?

2019-01-11 Thread James Brown
On 11 Jan 2019, at 4:08 am, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Larry Stone: >>> # Log file to use for error messages. "syslog" logs to syslog, >>> # /dev/stderr logs to stderr. >>> #log_path = syslog >>> log_path = /var/log/mail.log >>> >>> So I?ve had to change this so that it writes directly to the

Re: concurrency rate limit

2019-01-11 Thread Wietse Venema
li...@lazygranch.com: > I'm wondering if I have my rate limiting set up correctly. Note I have > that perl script that sniffs out dynamic IP addresses, so I am not sure > how this user is even getting concurrent connections. Postfix receives more than 4 concurrent connections at a rate of more

Re: The AUTH parameter on MAIL commands

2019-01-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Jacky: > Hi Wietse, > > Thank you for the information. > > Just wonder that will Postfix support the Message Submission BURL Extension? Possibly. See my other post on that subject. BURL does not require changes to Postfix's AUTH= support. Wietse

pflogsumm milter patch

2019-01-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, I have made a small patch for counting milter rejections in pflogsumm. I put it on http://test.fantomas.sk/pflogsumm-milter-test.patch pflogsumm now displays erors below when using amavisd-milter refusals. I would strip the "from ", but first I would like to ask people who use header

Re: concurrency rate limit

2019-01-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jan 11, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Gary wrote: > > Now with that interpretation of the log, this makes sense. I was thinking > rate and concurrency were different things. They are different things. Both the rate and the concurrency were exceeded in the logs you posted. * Concurrency = Number

Re: concurrency rate limit

2019-01-11 Thread Gary
Now with that interpretation of the log, this makes sense. I was thinking rate and concurrency were different things.   Original Message   From: wie...@porcupine.org Sent: January 11, 2019 4:21 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Reply-to: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: concurrency rate