Hello,
Our postfix v3.8.3 mail gateway server (for incoming mail) filters
clients using postscreen as follows:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
zen.spamhaus.org*3
b.barracudacentral.org*2
bl.spameatingmonkey.net*2
bl.spamcop.net
On 2024-01-10 at 10:12:26 UTC-0500 (Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:12:26 +0200)
Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
and this causes legitimate mail to be discarded (actual mail addresses
modified above).
My question in this case: If I understand right, it seems that
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 05:38:37PM +0200, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > On 10/1/2024 5:24 ?.?., Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> > > If you use postscreen, remove reject_rbl_client from *_restrictions.
> > >
> > >
On 10.01.24 17:12, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users wrote:
Our postfix v3.8.3 mail gateway server (for incoming mail) filters
clients using postscreen as follows:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
zen.spamhaus.org*3
b.barracudacentral.org*2
bl.spameatingmonkey.net*2
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Forgot to push these. It's uploadin now, but I am on public WIFI.
Wietse
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To
On 10/1/2024 5:24 μ.μ., Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
If you use postscreen, remove reject_rbl_client from *_restrictions.
reject_rhsbl_client, reject_rhsbl_sender and reject_rhsbl_helo are
fine to stay since they use something postscreen does not.
Thanks Matus for your
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 05:38:37PM +0200, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On 10/1/2024 5:24 μ.μ., Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > If you use postscreen, remove reject_rbl_client from *_restrictions.
> >
> > reject_rhsbl_client, reject_rhsbl_sender and
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
lists:
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20240109.tar.gz
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20240109.HISTORY
both of which report:
The requested URL
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
>
> lists:
>
> http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20240109.tar.gz
>
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 16:45, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> Keeping in mind
> that of course in smtpd(8) there's no scoring, so the whitelists with
> negative scores aren't available. If you absolutely want to ensure
> that the whitelists are honoured,
On 10/1/2024 6:30 μ.μ., Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
You should be more selective about your long lists of DNSBLs. They are
not all the same thing, and so are not all suitable for use at
postscreen time. It seems like you are ignoring the fact that the
underlying cause of this rejection
On 10.01.24 20:18, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users wrote:
Unfortunately at this time I don't have the luxury to invest time in
more complex configuration scenarios as mail server management is only
a small fraction of our tiny department... I guess I have to trust
Postscreen and avoid false
12 matches
Mail list logo
