Re: Distinction between next-hop and nexthop ?

[J Doe]

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Viktor Dukhovni  
> wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:37 PM, J Doe  wrote:
>> 
>> Example:
>> 
>>   “Match against the next-hop domain...”
>> 
>>   “When MX lookups are not suppressed, this is the original nexthop 
>> domain...”
>> 
>> Up until this point, I had been viewing them as interchangeable, but are 
>> they in fact referring to two different things/terms ?
> 
> Same.

Hi Viktor,

Ok, thanks.

- J

Re: Distinction between next-hop and nexthop ?

[Viktor Dukhovni]

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:37 PM, J Doe  wrote:
> 
> Example:
> 
>“Match against the next-hop domain...”
> 
>“When MX lookups are not suppressed, this is the original nexthop 
> domain...”
> 
> Up until this point, I had been viewing them as interchangeable, but are they 
> in fact referring to two different things/terms ?

Same.

-- 
Viktor.

Distinction between next-hop and nexthop ?

[J Doe]

Hi,

I was reading the documentation for the smtp_tls_verify_cert_match parameter in 
man 5 postconf and noted under the “nexthop” strategy that both next-hop and 
nexthop are specified.

Example:

“Match against the next-hop domain...”

“When MX lookups are not suppressed, this is the original nexthop domain...”

Up until this point, I had been viewing them as interchangeable, but are they 
in fact referring to two different things/terms ?

Thanks,

- J