Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:28 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY For backwards compatibility with Postfix version 2.0 and So you leave your online documentation using the syntax

Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:05AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:28 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY For backwards compatibility with Postfix

Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:56 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: Nothing of the sort, the documentation shows *current* syntax and briefly documents any legacy syntax. Your tone is in the above is unnecessarily hostile. Please don't go there... Nothing in

Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:06:58AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: fancy.cf: ... search_base = dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s result_attribute = memberaddr special_result_attribute = memberdn

Documentation patch: Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:12:23PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote: Note the above deprecated postmap -q syntax. It is not deprecated, this never worked. Index: proto/LDAP_README.html *** proto/LDAP_README.html 6 Feb 2010 07:34:26 - 1.1.1.1 --- proto/LDAP_README.html 24 Jun

Versioned documentation, was Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:05AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:28 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY For backwards compatibility with Postfix

Re: Versioned documentation, was Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Phil Howard
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 15:30, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: Another drawback to having versioned documentation online is that El Goog is as likely to find the wrong version of a document. If a seeker ends up at http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html , all's well, but not necessarily so

Re: Versioned documentation, was Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-24 Thread Wietse Venema
So you leave your online documentation using the syntax of a release that is 6 years old? That seems fairly odd. Why not use versioned documentation? People can legitimately use Postfix over a span of many years. Currently, the oldest supported release is Postfix version 2.4, which was

Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-23 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:15 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: File names must start with / or .. Thanks. It looks like the online documentation needs updating to match this. postmap -q global_us...@zimbra.com ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-groups.cf

Re: postmap -q and ldap

2010-06-23 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:20:34PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:15 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: File names must start with / or .. Thanks. It looks like the online documentation needs updating to match this.