Re: [postgis-users] creating topology data is slow

2015-06-05 Thread Lars Aksel Opsahl
Then it's finally done validating and it took about 40 hours. [local] postgres@sl=# select * from ValidateTopology('topo_ar5_sysdata'); error | id1 | id2 ---+-+- (0 rows) Time: 145477755.129 ms Lars Fra: Sandro Santilli

Re: [postgis-users] Import TIN via SQL COPY from file

2015-06-05 Thread RĂ©mi Cura
Hey first copy has a couple of options that you should check. Secondly find one correct tin as text, and check that you can use st_geomfromtext on this tin, to be sure it is correct. Then create a test file with only the found tin with correct encoding and end of line. You should be ok . Chers

Re: [postgis-users] Different results in datum transform pg v2 vs pg v1

2015-06-05 Thread David Fawcett
I forgot to include the full version info. SELECT Postgis_Full_Version(); Old Server: POSTGIS=1.3.6 GEOS=3.2.2-CAPI-1.6.2 PROJ=Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September 2009 USE_STATS New Server POSTGIS=2.1.1 r12113 GEOS=3.4.2-CAPI-1.8.2 r3921 PROJ=Rel. 4.8.0, 6 March 2012 GDAL=GDAL 1.9.2, released 2012/10/08

[postgis-users] Different results in datum transform pg v2 vs pg v1

2015-06-05 Thread David Fawcett
We are finally able to retire one of our older servers running an old version of PostGIS and we are migrating everything over to a new install. One thing that I am noticing is that I am getting different behavior between the two versions when transforming some values from 4267 to 4326. The Old

Re: [postgis-users] Different results in datum transform pg v2 vs pg v1

2015-06-05 Thread Richard Greenwood
You're going from NAD27 to NAD83. Do you have the nad27 and nad83 datum files installed in /usr/share/proj? Rich On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:19 AM, David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot to include the full version info. SELECT Postgis_Full_Version(); Old Server: