Richard Mann wrote:
They almost certainly mean shared with peds and white-paint segregated
from peds (as opposed to track which the Germans think is completely
segregated).
Yep. I'm sure there's room for more help text and little pop-ups
beside particular settings (and, eventually, for
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Potlatch is a conscious (collective) act of authorship, not really a
democracy. You can't design coherent beginner-friendly software, or
documentation, democratically - as the wiki sadly proves.
I think it's worth
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Segregated cycle path: A path where cyclists and pedestrians are
separated by a painted line or kerb.
Sounds an awful lot like cycleway=track to me.
Shared cycle path: A path where cyclists and pedestrians share the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
I think it's worth being cautious on adding things purely based on
their %age occurrences too - without checking how many people vs 1
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Who would like to see some judgement used in picking icons for the dnd
panel, mutter mutter!
Do tell? I'm probably guilty of whatever the crime is. Do you mean
that the icons just look bad together (all different colours)
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Segregated cycle path: A path where cyclists and pedestrians are
separated by a painted line or kerb.
Sounds an awful lot like cycleway=track
On 03/02/11 12:27, Steve Bennett wrote:
Do tell? I'm probably guilty of whatever the crime is. Do you mean
that the icons just look bad together (all different colours) or that
they're badly drawn...or what?
Well the Florist icon stands out like a sore thumb to start with - not
only is it a
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 03/02/11 12:27, Steve Bennett wrote:
Do tell? I'm probably guilty of whatever the crime is. Do you mean
that the icons just look bad together (all different colours) or that
they're badly drawn...or what?
Well the Florist
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, are we perhaps reaching the point where not all node features
should be dnd's? For example, I don't think dnd highway=turning_circle
is particularly useful...
Absolutely - there are also things that I'd like
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The places section has five (yes, five) completely identical icons.
Whereas what it probably should be is one icon place with a drop
down specifying the type.
Is anyone interested in map_features supporting this kind of feature
Well the Florist icon stands out like a sore thumb to start with - not
only is it a different colour to almost all the other shopping icons
but it is also a completely different shape.
The florist icons certainly needs to be removed or attribution needs
to be added since it is sourced from
11 matches
Mail list logo
