Re: [Potlatch-dev] Testing new versions

2012-03-08 Thread Andy Allan
On 7 March 2012 20:12, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: This may be a silly question - asking for something that exists already, but just in case not: How hard would it be have a version of Potlatch2 available after merging for final testing before becoming the default P2

Re: [Potlatch-dev] Testing new versions

2012-03-08 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: How hard would it be have a version of Potlatch2 available after merging for final testing before becoming the default P2 version on the site?  To be useful it'd need to be able to be invoked with a GPX file (not

Re: [Potlatch-dev] Testing new versions

2012-03-07 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:12 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: This may be a silly question - asking for something that exists already, but just in case not: How hard would it be have a version of Potlatch2 available after merging for final testing before becoming the default

Re: [Potlatch-dev] Testing new versions

2012-03-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
SomeoneElse wrote: How hard would it be have a version of Potlatch2 available after merging for final testing before becoming the default P2 version on the site? I can see merit in users being able to select an unstable P2 as their editor, which would work 99% of the time and be useful for