On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Also, are we perhaps reaching the point where not all node features >> should be dnd's? For example, I don't think dnd highway=turning_circle >> is particularly useful... > > Absolutely - there are also things that I'd like potlatch2 to > recognise when selected (e.g. country nodes) without encouraging > anyone to add more. We also have the issue that some of our "point" > tags are inappropriate for "pois" - e.g. turning_circle should be an > option for selectedwaynode but possibly not for selectedpoinode - but > the whole distinction between nodes and ways on one hand and pois, > points, lines and areas on the other is a little bit confused in p2 at > the moment.
I've done the first part of this - you can't drag-and-drop turning circles any more. See http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25270 Any preferences for how node vs waynode distinction should work? Should node always imply waynode (but not vice versa?) How about: Option 1: <waynode> Option 2: <point wayrequired="yes"> Presumably either way it would also imply that draganddrop="no". Incidentally, is there a particular reason that map_features uses point/line/area terminology, rather than node/way/area? I'd be happy to convert it, if not. Steve _______________________________________________ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
