Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Jay
On 12/17/04, Kjell declared: Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. Prebinding, perhaps? Excellent point. I like to run the freeware Yasu, which repairs permissions and updates prebindings (amongst other

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Kjell Olausson
A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. Prebinding, perhaps? http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2003/11/21/maintenance.html -- Regards, Kjell Olausson

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Giovanni Andreani
A-NO-NE at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 17/12/04 3:09 pm Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. It's working fine for me with 10.3.7. didn't use a combi update though. -- Derry Thompson No problems here

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Stuart Miller
I used the Combo Updater and have had no problems... so far. --- PowerMac G5 (Dual 2GHz, 2GB RAM, 10.3.7) - PowerMail 5.1 Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. Before and after Combi-update, I repaired

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread computer artwork by subhash
[A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17.12.2004 um 10:09 Uhr:] Anyone? No, no problems. -- http://www.subhash.at

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Andy Fragen
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* I updated to 10.3.7 and haven't seen any real slow-downs. -- Andy Fragen On Fri, Dec 17, 2004, A-NO-NE Music said: Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Derry Thompson
A-NO-NE at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 17/12/04 3:09 pm Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. It's working fine for me with 10.3.7. didn't use a combi update though. -- Derry Thompson g l o d e r w o r k

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 17 12 2004 at 10:09 am -0500, A-NO-NE Music wrote: Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. [Un]fortunately, I'm noticing no problems at all with 10.3.7. -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat

Re: Snooze All?

2004-12-17 Thread Dan Webb
I have the same problem. I've tried selecting the Automatically access the network only if it is already available, but it doesn't stop Powermail from trying to retrieve email while waking up, before the network has been established. Dan Original Message On 12/14/04 12:33 AM

Re: OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread Dr Dave
I always wait a few weeks read the various Mac tech website before updating... Best, Dave Nathanson Mac Medix in reply to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), A-NO-NE Music's message of 7:09 AM, 12/17/04 Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few

OSX103.7 anyone?

2004-12-17 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Ever since I Combi-updated to OSX10.3.7, PM5.1 is acting slow. Clicking on a folder causes a few seconds of spinning beachball. Before and after Combi-update, I repaired permission, ran fsck, dump sys/ usr caches as my routine. None of other apps I use got any impact but PM. I have to find

Re: Snooze All?

2004-12-17 Thread Leonard Morgenstern
On 12/14/04 12:33 AM Lally Singh wrote: So I've got PM checking a few mailboxes for me, on my laptop (primary machine). However, when I wake it up, it's often been checking mail when it fell asleep. Then i get a complaint message from every one of those accounts it was checking. Look under

PM modifies attachement?

2004-12-17 Thread Urs Gruetzner
Using PM 5.1 on OSX.3.6 Several times I was receiving from Niversoft a license file for a filter for a Communigate Pro Mailserver which finally did not work (it was not recognized by the filter as valid license file). We have found out that on the way to the server the license file had received

Re: SpamSieve whitelist/PM whitelist

2004-12-17 Thread Wayne Brissette
Wayne Brissette wrote: How I wish. All my other filters are after the SpamSieve filters. And yes Andy it is set for incoming and always. Oh well. Maybe I'll figure it out. If the Spam: evaluate filter is the first one, with an always condition, and evaluate spam rating as single action, then