Re: Missing attachments

2005-03-11 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Zeph Bender wrote: >Some users are failing to receive attachments. Others in the same office >are receiving the same attachments fine. I do find these in the >Attachments folder; they just don't show up in the mail browser, and >generally aren't decoded properly. What's the deal? This is PM 5

Missing attachments

2005-03-11 Thread Zeph Bender
This has been discussed before; I'm sorry there are no archives to search. Some users are failing to receive attachments. Others in the same office are receiving the same attachments fine. I do find these in the Attachments folder; they just don't show up in the mail browser, and generally ar

[OT]Oldest member of list

2005-03-11 Thread Leonard Morgenstern
On 3/7/05 12:31 PM Nick Keck wrote: > >At 68 years of age, I wonder how many members of this find list are older >than I. (This is beginning to resemble the "sic list" that discusses >QuarkXPress matters; that's good.) 82 as of last Friday. I haven't lost my marbles, but I sometimes can't find

Re: Still Love PowerMail but...

2005-03-11 Thread Derry Thompson
Evie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 10/3/05 11:55 pm >It would be helpful when dealing with commercial clients who expect me to >be able to send multipart emails and also for me to know more about >sending them. For those who don't want it, well, they could turn it off. :) Try MaxBulk Mailer, It'

Re: Still Love PowerMail but...

2005-03-11 Thread Graham B
On or about Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:22:30 +1100 Raul said - >Evie Leder wrote: > >>I don't understand what the fuss is. IF PM allowed rich text or multipart >>outgoing emails, those who didn't want it would not have to use it. It >>would widen it's base, which would be good for the company. (but, wi

Re: Still Love PowerMail but...

2005-03-11 Thread Raul Vera
Evie Leder wrote: >I don't understand what the fuss is. IF PM allowed rich text or multipart >outgoing emails, those who didn't want it would not have to use it. It >would widen it's base, which would be good for the company. (but, with >the text-only zealots, it might be a difficult move) Perha

Re: Still Love PowerMail but...

2005-03-11 Thread Evie Leder
I don't understand what the fuss is. IF PM allowed rich text or multipart outgoing emails, those who didn't want it would not have to use it. It would widen it's base, which would be good for the company. (but, with the text-only zealots, it might be a difficult move) Perhaps it could be set up w