Andy Fragen (10/5/05 4:17 am) said:
At the very least I think it should be an option to use the built-in zip
compression as the default compression method.
Yes! Zip is a more useful cross-platform format.
OS X also has gzip.
Jeremy
To clarify - that runs in the background, I check the mail via PM.
---marlyse
former message(s) quotes: -
MacFreePops 1.5 - that works perfectly for those accounts - I check all
my yahoo and gmail accounts with that. You should find it via VersionTracker.
--marlyse
Well, I like zip. Even in Jaguar I added my own Zipit.
Andy Fragen on 5/10/05 said
Barbara,
I think it originated in Panther, but I don't know. A quick Google
search didn't help.
At the very least I think it should be an option to use the built-in zip
compression as the default compression
Barbara,
I think it originated in Panther, but I don't know. A quick Google
search didn't help.
At the very least I think it should be an option to use the built-in zip
compression as the default compression method. You don't necessarily
have to remove the StuffIt option, but clearly Apple is
MacFreePops 1.5 - that works perfectly for those accounts - I check all
my yahoo and gmail accounts with that. You should find it via VersionTracker.
--marlyse
former message(s) quotes: -
Just as I thought, but had to make sure of the facts from
the PowerMail users...
Just as I thought, but had to make sure of the facts from
the PowerMail users... thanks for the info - I'll let you know
if any scripts work with PM. It'll probably be like looking for
a needle in the hay stack! lol Thanks for the input folks!
On 5/10/05 at 8:01 Barbara Needham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Fragen on 5/10/05 said
Currently, Tiger ships without StuffIt. The built-in compression method
is a zip archive. Since PowerMail 5 is only supported on OS X, is there
any reason not to change PM's built-in compression options to be zip
instead of StuffIt.
As long as it works in Jaguar and
On 5/10/05 at 9:50 AM, PowerMail Engineering ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Steve Abrahamson wrote:
The filters do use is, but have multiple lines of them to capture all
instances I've come across. Manual application of the filter files it
properly.
...and none of that explains how a message could
Steve Abrahamson said:
Manual application of the filter files it properly
Interesting. But did you manual apply ALL filters. If not, you can't know
for sure it's a different treatment.
PM 5.1 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
9 matches
Mail list logo
