Re: DB Message Full With Low # Messages

2005-05-24 Thread Marlyse Comte
add the date to something like '20050524-archive'. Then I would launch PM with the combo keys held down - I forget always what they are and have to fiddle around myself, I guess it's something like option+command while launching PM. In the dialogbox I would choose first just compact. That

Re: DB Message Full With Low # Messages

2005-05-24 Thread Olaf Drümmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, 24 May 2005 10:59:52 +0200 >In any case, I'll try to proceed as if the only problem was the DB's size >and would like to ask you: > >1. Is the message database increased by the Address Book as well? >2. If compacting the Database, can I still read single messages? >3.

Re: Display Question for 5.2 users

2005-05-24 Thread Mikael Byström
Tim Lapin said: >Does anyone else still experience this? I'm not. > Is it fixed on 5.2? I dunno. > Is there something else I can do? compact and verify? A-NO-NE Music said: > Jerome, any chance of QE implementation in a future? I'd love that PM 5.2b6 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/550 | 512

DB Message Full With Low # Messages

2005-05-24 Thread Giovanni Andreani
Hello This is the strange thing happened to me yesterday: PowerMail advised me that it can't handle a message database bigger than 2GB, so I selected some 40/50 messages stored in a folder since about a year ago, moved them to trash, and when told PM to delete the trash folder; an alert window t

Re: powermail-discuss Digest Minimum System

2005-05-24 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Ira Lansing wrote: >What is the minimum System requirement for PM 5.2? The web site says >10.2.8, 10.3.9 and 10.4.1 and not a more general 10.3.x or 10.2.x; >although for version 4.2.1 of PowerMail it does give the general. Does >that mean if 10.3 it must be at least 10.3.9 to use 9M 5.2? Powe

Re: powermail-discuss Digest Minimum System

2005-05-24 Thread Ira Lansing
What is the minimum System requirement for PM 5.2? The web site says 10.2.8, 10.3.9 and 10.4.1 and not a more general 10.3.x or 10.2.x; although for version 4.2.1 of PowerMail it does give the general. Does that mean if 10.3 it must be at least 10.3.9 to use 9M 5.2? Thanks--Ira

Dup'ing

2005-05-24 Thread Anthony Sanna
I want to bring my mail settings and databases from work to my home computer. Will the folder: home/Library/Mail/PowerMail Files and the files: home/Library/Preferences/com.ctmdev.PowerMail.plist & home/ Library/Preferences/PowerMail Prefs do it? Tony -- Anthony R. Sanna SACO Foods, Inc. 1-80

Re: Display Question for 5.2 users

2005-05-24 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Bob Moody / 2005/05/23 / 01:20 PM wrote: >try trashing the .plist file for PM. Also rebuild permissions, >reprebind the system, run the cron scripts, and maybe even run >diskwarrior (but get the new version first if you're using tiger.) Wait, wait, wait! PM's pref is not .plist, There is no su

Re: Display Question for 5.2 users

2005-05-24 Thread Ben Kennedy
Bob Moody wrote at 1:20 pm (-0400) on Mon 23 May 2005: >try trashing the .plist file for PM. Also rebuild permissions, >reprebind the system, run the cron scripts, and maybe even run >diskwarrior (but get the new version first if you're using tiger.) Holy crap Bob, calm down! Do you do this ev

Re: Display Question for 5.2 users

2005-05-24 Thread Bob Moody
== Tim Lapin, thank you for your message. = ***REPLYING TO YOUR MESSAGE QUOTED BELOW. REPLY IS ABOVE YOUR MESSAGE*** REPLY: try trashing the .plist file for PM. Also rebuild permissions, reprebind the system, run the cron scripts, and

Display Question for 5.2 users

2005-05-24 Thread Tim Lapin
Hello all, As you can see by my sig, I am using PM 5.1. I am still experiencing an intermittent problem that I've seen since at least 4.x if not 3.x. When moving a bunch of messages to the trash, the folder portion of the main browser window gets overwritten with the names of the moved messages