Re: Crash report 5.5

on Thu, Nov 2, 2006 "Bruce Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may have said: > Had my first crash since using PM 5.5, I've dropped the crash log here: > > >I was, I believe, trying to do a reply all. (Though as I recall >I may have been doing som

Re: Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

No, silly. Your response was at the bottom. But the following reply was at the top. I was just replying after that to suggest in the ultimate scheme of things it really doesn't matter. >>Hmmm... I don't know. I kinda like responses at the bottom. >Did I suggest responses can't go at the bottom? p.

Re: Sloppy thinking in sigs (was"Re: 2 features I'd like"

C. A. Niemiec said: >Hmmm... I don't know. I kinda like responses at the bottom. Did I suggest responses can't go at the bottom? PM 5.2.3 Swedish | OS X 10.4.5 | Powerbook G4/400Mhz | 1GB RAM | 30GB HD

Re: Crash report 5.5

>Hey CTM, how about supporting Smart Crash Reports? Takes 5 seconds to >add to your application. Seriously. Does that require running Application Enhancer? That thing utterly borked my system, and it really messes with PowerMail, well, stopped PowerMail hiding for one thing but a lot of things i