Andy Fragen said:
>What I want is something that is flexible enough to work in a manner
>that will make your workflow and mine easier. This would include
>intermingling of smart and concrete folders, possibly tabs, etc.
Besides the intermingling part as a necessity, that's pretty much
describes
You didn't quote the most important part of my point.
> Concrete folders displays messages that have been "physically" put in them,
> whereas smart folders display messages based upon some search algorithm.
--
Andy Fragen
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006, computer artwork by subhash said:
>[Andy Fragen <
>Andy Fragen said:
>
>>Concrete folders displays
>>messages that have been "physically" put in them, whereas smart folders
>>display messages based upon some search algorithm.
>
>That's what different about them, yes (though I'd be tempted to say
>"logically"). Would you really say that search res
[Andy Fragen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 24.3.2006 um 15:17 Uhr:]
>But are they really different things.
Yes, I think so.
>They're both folders and as such
>should have all the same features and characteristics of folders.
No. Smart folders and real folders have only the name in common.
Nex
Mikael Byström said:
>I don't see there is much more point to discuss placement of
>imaginary folders, unless can be further detailed in any useful fashion.
Some words disappeared here. I meant:
I don't see there is much more point to discuss placement of imaginary
folders, unless thoughts that
Andy Fragen said:
>Concrete folders displays
>messages that have been "physically" put in them, whereas smart folders
>display messages based upon some search algorithm.
That's what different about them, yes (though I'd be tempted to say
"logically"). Would you really say that search results win
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, Mikael Byström said:
>Andy Fragen said:
>
>>Why couldn't smart folders simply integrate with real folders and be
>>alpha sorted? Then all they really need is a different icon so the user
>>has some indication that they're different. I also see some sort of plus/
>>minus/gear
Andy Fragen said:
>Why couldn't smart folders simply integrate with real folders and be
>alpha sorted? Then all they really need is a different icon so the user
>has some indication that they're different. I also see some sort of plus/
>minus/gear menu at the bottom of the folder panel.
Well, I
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, Mikael Byström said:
>Andy Fragen said:
>
>>I'm not really sure why a smart folder, which should have a different
>>icon, need be any different than a regular folder in function. In other
>>words, double click it and it opens in another window. Is that somehow
>>not similar
Andy Fragen said:
>I'm not really sure why a smart folder, which should have a different
>icon, need be any different than a regular folder in function. In other
>words, double click it and it opens in another window. Is that somehow
>not similar to incorporating smart folders into the RMB?
Not
[computer artwork by subhash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.3.2006 um
23:29 Uhr:]
>I am using...
Addition:
I am checking 7 POP3-Mail-Accounts.
I shut down the machine every night. It is running whole the day.
--
http://www.subhash.at
I'll chime in as another who rarely uses the RMB.
You currently have:
40796 Messages
45 Message folders
44 Message Filters
6 Text Clippings
7 Signatures
and I check 9 different email accounts.
I have a similar amount and variety as do you. SpamSieve is
indispensable. Most of my filters are for
[Mikael Byström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.3.2006 um 20:01
Uhr:]
>Thanks for sharing your experiences. Would you care to describe your
>workflow?
I currently have:
9066 Messages
31 Message folders
44 Message Filters
23 Text Clippings
28 Signatures
46 Scripts
I am using the 3 panel view a
A-NO-NE Music said:
>I am involved with more than 10 active beta test lists. Constantly,
>more than 2 or 3 products are close to shipping so my mail browsing
>priority changes day to day. This is the reason.
But doesn't this mean you could be helped by 'smart folders' or similar
solutions unde
Mikael Byström / 2006/03/23 / 02:01 PM wrote:
>Would you care to describe your
>workflow? What types of email do you receive and send? Business, mailing
>lists, private? What are the volume of messages?
My daily volume is about 300-500 excluding another 500 SPAM.
Unfortunately, last couple versi
Hiro said:
>Mikael Byström / 2006/03/22 / 12:39 PM wrote:
>
>>One conclusion I made from the "RMW in the browser" discussion is that
>>the recent messages listing seem to be a vital part of how PowerMail
>>users interact with their email messages. At least for users being on
>>this list.
>>It's a
[A-NO-NE Music <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.3.2006 um 9:19 Uhr:]
>I
>didn't feel it benefits my workflow so I never opened RMW again.
So did I.
--
http://www.subhash.at
Mikael Byström / 2006/03/22 / 12:39 PM wrote:
>One conclusion I made from the "RMW in the browser" discussion is that
>the recent messages listing seem to be a vital part of how PowerMail
>users interact with their email messages. At least for users being on
>this list.
>It's also true for me. Wi
Mikael Byström said:
> It's "virtual" in the sense that the messages are actually stored (from
>the user standpoint at least) in "concrete" folders, often in a well-
>known folder structure created by the user him/herself.
Should better have read: "It's "virtual" in the sense that the messages
s
Please, pretty please take part in this discussion!
One conclusion I made from the "RMW in the browser" discussion is that
the recent messages listing seem to be a vital part of how PowerMail
users interact with their email messages. At least for users being on
this list.
It's also true for me.
20 matches
Mail list logo
