Re: OT: HTML vs Rich text

Interesting thread. I just sent totally formatted RTF mail from Outlook on Win2K to my PM account, and it arrived as text/plain. Even the source shows no trace of RTF. Hm... -- - Hiro [PROTECTED] [PROTECTED] [PROTECTED]

Re: OT: HTML vs Rich text

This is slightly off topic, but back in the days when I used to use Eudora I recall that in between the options for sending email either as Plain Text or as HTML, there was a middle option: Rich Text. As I remember it, this allowed basic text formatting (Bold, italic, increase size etc) but not

Re: OT: HTML vs Rich text

Hi all, This is something that I have always thought would be a halfway house between those wanting some form of formatting - bold, underline etc and those who want the full HTML gamut of pictures and fancy fonts. I've never quite understood why mail clients in general do not use a limited RTF

Re: OT: HTML vs Rich text

reject HTML mail on grounds of it being potentially harmful spam. My question, therefore, (you knew I'd get around to it eventually, right?) is this: Does Rich Text email suffer from the same fate. If I were to send out promotional email with bold headings, would there be the same chance of it

OT: HTML vs Rich text

Hi gang; This is slightly off topic, but back in the days when I used to use Eudora I recall that in between the options for sending email either as Plain Text or as HTML, there was a middle option: Rich Text. As I remember it, this allowed basic text formatting (Bold, italic, increase size etc)