Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Richard Hart
Bob Moody wrote: Spam blockers are unnecessary. You are contradicting yourself. You act as your own spam blocker. If spam blockers were unnecessary, than why would you take actions to block spam? You can't have it both ways. Just use your web browser to log into your pop account using webmail.

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Michael Tsai
On Apr 22, 2004, at 7:29 AM, david.gordon wrote: Your SpamSieve corpus is stored in your Library folder, so there is nothing to move. So why does SS report that its only had a few hundred messages since 20.04.04 when I have been using it for well over a year and had thousands of message

Re(3): Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread fk
On 22/04/2004 at 7:28 AM I saw Bob Moody type: Spam blockers are unnecessary. Just categorically saying they are unnecessary is a bit extreme. Just use your web browser to log into your pop account using webmail. Look at what's there and delete everything that you don't want. (I hit select

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Wayne Brissette
Max Gossell [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 4/22/04 at 6:58 stated: Spam blockers are unnecessary. Is this really the TRUTH? Using his method, it's not that they are unnecessary, he just doesn't call them that. He is the spam blocker in his case. EarthLink has been very good with SPAM recently, so I

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Mark Smith
I deleted the version of SpamSieve in the PM folder, before I even launched PM 5. There seems to have been no ill effects, and my existing copy of SS (2.1.4) is still using my existing Corpus. However, it looks like you need to use the fly and smiley icons in the Toolbar to add Spam or Good

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Max Gossell
At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:28:26 -0400 (CET), Bob Moody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Spam blockers are unnecessary. Is this really the TRUTH? Just use your web browser to log into your pop account using webmail. Look at what's there and delete everything that you don't want. (I hit select all then

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread david.gordon
PowerMail Engineering wrote on Thu 22 Apr 2004 at 12:58 +0200 Your SpamSieve corpus is stored in your Library folder, so there is nothing to move. So why does SS report that its only had a few hundred messages since 20.04.04 when I have been using it for well over a year and had thousands of

Re(2): Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread Bob Moody
Spam blockers are unnecessary. Just use your web browser to log into your pop account using webmail. Look at what's there and delete everything that you don't want. (I hit select all then individually uncheck the ones I want, then hit the delete button on the page.) After doing that, log into

Re: Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread PowerMail Engineering
david.gordon wrote: I already had SpamSieve. I think that PM 5 is running the copy supplied. Can I simply replace the copy in the PM folder with my original copy to use my own corpus etc. Your SpamSieve corpus is stored in your Library folder, so there is nothing to move. PowerMail 5 requires

Which SpamSieve?

2004-04-22 Thread david.gordon
I already had SpamSieve. I think that PM 5 is running the copy supplied. Can I simply replace the copy in the PM folder with my original copy to use my own corpus etc. -- david.gordon