Lane Roathe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2007-05-08 00:33 said:
I've never figured out the attraction of IMAP, maybe just because I'm
focused on speed so much. Using both in several programs and via webmail
I continue to prefer POP3 from both a user and server perspective.
(Although anymore I have to
Lane Roathe suggested:
If PM ever goes to the dark side and becomes HTML compliant, I'll
switch to another program -
As nothing most likely would stop you, under the described scenario,
from sending plain text messages and keep labeling incoming HTML-
messages as spam, that is a quite a childish
Curtis suggested:
Webmail has made serious inroads into the popularity of IMAP. Webmail
offers portability of email across machines, and with adequate
functionality to please the majority of users interested in such
portability.
According to what reputable authority?
Mikael
Tech facts:
PM
Mikael Byström sez:
Lane Roathe suggested:
If PM ever goes to the dark side and becomes HTML compliant, I'll
switch to another program -
As nothing most likely would stop you, under the described scenario,
from sending plain text messages and keep labeling incoming HTML-
messages as spam, that
Sean McBride on 5/9/07 said
For most, the biggest thing is being able to keep your mail at work,
home, and laptop all in sync.
I manage to do this with pop mail, by not deleting from server. However,
this works only for INCOMING. For outgoing, it does not. There IMAP does
have the advantage if
On 9 May Barbara Needham wrote:
On the other hand, I turn on IMAP in PowerMail when I need
it [for .mac mail]
I use my .mac account as a POP3 one. Works fine. Any advantage to using
it as IMAP other than access to one's Sent mail from several machines?
My young grandson accesses his .mac
powermail-discuss Digest #2629 - Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Re: PowerMail and IMAP
by Lane Roathe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PowerMail and IMAP
by Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PowerMail and IMAP
by Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PowerMail and IMAP
Michael Lewis exploded:
Geez, louise, you're rude. Can you tone it down a bit, please? It's
really getting tiresome when you jump all over a person's case for
stating a personal preference as if it is some personal attack on you or
something. I didn't see anything in Lane's post that said you
Mikael Byström sez:
And, yes I can tone it down nevertheless. There's no need for making
people angry for the sake of it. My apologies.
See how easy that was, and how unnecessary the rest was?
Thanks!
--
Michael Lewis
Off Balance Productions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.offbalance.com
on Wed, May 9, 2007 Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] may
have said:
It's like if I said if PM ever switches to an _optional_ OS X metal
interface, I'd switch. Like I couldn't keep using the old look (rolling
up my eyes).
I thought I'd addressed that by saying I'm not against improving IMAP or
Lane Roathe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2007-05-09 16:36 said:
- 2GB DB size limit; be nice to get at least 4GB, that would hold me for
a few more years until we can get the limit removed all together.
Alas, CTM has said that they won't be upping this limit. :(
I've managed to survive at 1.8 or so,
Barbara Needham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2007-05-09 12:31 said:
For most, the biggest thing is being able to keep your mail at work,
home, and laptop all in sync.
I manage to do this with pop mail, by not deleting from server. However,
this works only for INCOMING.
But it doesn't really _work_.
12 matches
Mail list logo
