powermail-discuss Digest #2555 - Friday, February 2, 2007
Re: Something happened
by "PowerMail Engineering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re(2): Something happened
by "Alan Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Odd clock behaviour
by "John R. Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Something happened
From: "PowerMail Engineering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:02:49 +0100
Alan Harper wrote:
>1) How does one set a filter for low spam ratings?
You can't set a single filter to act on law ratings. But you can set
multiple filters that act on different ratings, with the one acting on
high ratings first, with the "dont apply subsequent filters" checkbox
enabled, so the next one will only catch low ratings.
>2) When did this change occur. Is this new for 5.5.3?
Nothing have changed. If you have a single filter that has a spam rating
criterion, and the spam rating has been set by SpamSieve, then you only
have "is high" (no "is low"). This is because you need to teach
SpamSieve when it makes mistakes, instead of adjusting the rating level
in your filters.
However if you have multiple filters that act on spam, you can adjust
the rating for each filter.
Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"If you liked Emailer, and many, many of us did, you'll love this app.
The PowerMail people are constantly adding new features. A lightning
fast search is one of its many attributes"
PowerMail user comment on www.macupdate.com
Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re(2): Something happened
From: "Alan Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:42:35 -0800
Got it. I just added a second spam filter.
A
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:02:49 +0100 PowerMail Engineering said:
>Nothing have changed. If you have a single filter that has a spam rating
>criterion, and the spam rating has been set by SpamSieve, then you only
>have "is high" (no "is low"). This is because you need to teach
>SpamSieve when it makes mistakes, instead of adjusting the rating level
>in your filters.
>However if you have multiple filters that act on spam, you can adjust
>the rating for each filter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Odd clock behaviour
From: "John R. Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:52:34 -0600
My system clock is set to 24-hour mode (00-23) and I have customized
date formats. Powermail has always seemed to respect this - The date
sent column correctly matches the system settings (both dates and
times), the short headers on mail messages (I'm using 3 pane - long list
view mode) correctly give the time in 24 hour mode and use my system
settings to format the dates on older messages.
But I just discovered that when I forward a mail, the date sent and
received information converts to AM/PM mode and the date format is not
the same as my system, as in this example
---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
Subject: Re: Class next week
Date Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 3:29 PM
Date Rec.: Thursday, February 1, 2007 3:29 PM
To match my system settings, this should be Thursday, 1 February 2007 15:29
I also just opened a mail message is a separate window to see how those
times and dates display in two pane mode, and in this view, Powermail
completely ignores my settings.
For the same message, Powermail has this at the top:
Date: 2/1/07, 3:29 PM
which should be (according to my system settings):
01-02/07, 15:29
Have others seen this in powermail? Or is there something special about
my computer?
cheers,
jrh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of powermail-discuss Digest
