[Powernet] Pilgrim rad release criteria

[emgoldin via Powernet]

I just saw an article that says the Massachusetts Dept of Health wants a 10 
mrem/yr standard for the decommissioning of Pilgrim. Does anyone know what the 
scenario will be for the site? Resident farmer? Just curious because there 
seems to be a trend for states to set limits considerably lower than NRC regs.
Thanks,  Eric Goldin,  CHP


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone___
Powernet mailing list
Powernet@hpspowernet.org
http://hpspowernet.org/mailman/listinfo/powernet_hpspowernet.org

Re: [Powernet] Pilgrim rad release criteria

[Tom Meek via Powernet]

The selection of even lower levels of clean up standards for each site/state is 
another example of how the linear threshold/ALARA concept results in 
unnecessary cost to the public and risk from moving large quantities of low 
level radioactive material across country. 
I’m proud that Oregon applied reason and used the NRC standard for clean up of 
Trojan. 
My evening rant 
Regards
Tom Meek CHP

Sent from Tom's iPhone

> On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:52 AM, emgoldin via Powernet  
> wrote:
> 
> I just saw an article that says the Massachusetts Dept of Health wants a 10 
> mrem/yr standard for the decommissioning of Pilgrim. Does anyone know what 
> the scenario will be for the site? Resident farmer? Just curious because 
> there seems to be a trend for states to set limits considerably lower than 
> NRC regs.
> 
> Thanks,  Eric Goldin,  CHP
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> ___
> Powernet mailing list
> Powernet@hpspowernet.org
> http://hpspowernet.org/mailman/listinfo/powernet_hpspowernet.org
___
Powernet mailing list
Powernet@hpspowernet.org
http://hpspowernet.org/mailman/listinfo/powernet_hpspowernet.org