> And what is the psychological relation between "fun", the "eye", and the
> beheld?
Deeply unanswered/able? :-) And, still, horses for courses. Outright
xio-paths might have a different psychological relation than we do.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> 1) Why are there 2 lists? Is this supposed to be a group that
>> understands usability / user experience / information architecture at
>> all? :-)
It bounced so I guess that means @open.ac.uk is deprecated? Too bad it
keeps showing up in search results. Yes, I realize there's not a lot
to be
>o students who know a lot more about programming than the lecturers
> (not hard since CS does not reward programming skill).
Hah. Everybody sucks at programming, be it ivory tower, or in the trenches.
:-P
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PPIG
Right on. Code often becomes so complicated that we really need multiple
ways to tackle, visualize, sort, query, etc. it. The fact that we have such
a paucity of tools and toolkits/frameworks for the tooling is I feel a long
standing indictment of the whole industry. I guess most people don't grok
> No doubt it could be construed as either-or rather than both-and. Having
> relevant media to support professional development is necessary. However, it
> seems rather too easy to end up with a cultural reduction toward the
> technological means rather than the ends (and thus we end up
http://goo.gl/ThkX8J
apologies if this is nothing new here.
sorry for bad paste formatting below.
Subrecursive Programming Languages, Part h Efficiency
and Program Structure
ROBERT L. CONSTABLE
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
AND
ALLAN B. BORODIN
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario,
random eg:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-English-based_programming_languages
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PPIG
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
good thing every human involved in decision making has the Decision Logics
wetware preloaded. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PPIG
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
(these papers might be old news around here)
I've done both oo/observer and reactive programming. Personally I do
find reactive easier to deal with overall. But going further, I wish
that we had somehow more reified representations (visually,
graphically, gui style, interactively, able to see it
my unbidden $0.02
i for one do feel there are times and places for things akin to literate
style cf. jupyter style notebooks.
tho personally i think the least unlikely way to have actually successful &
maintainable code would be to have truly good "executable specifications"
systems. i've never
> ASIC-B
i feel like a language designed with good pedagogical ux in mind would
should could also be a great day job language, no real inherent reason why
not.
CTM* tries to show layering of features in a language evolution graph, eg
start immutably and later add mutation, later add FFI.
what
$0.02,
* Unless you have a personal tutor, and a good one to boot, i think it
will be unfortunately rare to find a lecture, mooc, book, etc.
teaching the same programming thing N different ways to cover N
learning modalities.
* Do we even really know what the modalities are for learning? Does
> 3D printing is only interesting and motivating when you have specific
> problems to solve that are meaningful to you.
Please beware of making the same-but-opposite error as those folks who
don't present what you believe are useful specific problems during
teaching.
--
You received this
13 matches
Mail list logo
