http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/01/AR2005050100867.html
Iran Plans Defense of Nuclear Program
U.S. Is Set to Deliver Ultimatum at Meeting
By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 2, 2005; Page A01
Iran is planning to mount a staunch defense of its nuclear energy program at an
international conference beginning today and will insist on rights to the same
technology afforded to all members of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT), a senior Iranian official said in an interview yesterday.
The high-level counteroffensive, to be led by Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal
Kharrazi, comes in anticipation of a tough speech the Bush administration is
preparing to give today calling for international measures against Tehran
unless it gives up sensitive aspects of its nuclear program.
Mayors Iccho Itoh of Nagasaki, Japan, second from right, and Tadatoshi
Akiba of Hiroshima, right, participate in a rally in New York calling for
nuclear disarmament. (By Shannon Stapleton -- Reuters)
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
. Today's Headlines & Columnists
See a Sample | Sign Up Now
. Breaking News Alerts
See a Sample | Sign Up Now
M. Javad Zarif, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, said his country's
efforts are peaceful and well within its rights. Kharrazi, who will address the
gathering tomorrow, will spend much of this week discussing the issue with
diplomats from around the world.
The White House decided several days ago to send a mid-level delegation to the
United Nations, where diplomats will review ways to strengthen the
nonproliferation treaty. But efforts were underway late yesterday to persuade
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to deliver the U.S. address today. U.S.
officials did not rule out raising the profile of the delegation but said it
would be difficult for Rice, who returned Saturday from Latin America and is
scheduled to accompany President Bush to Europe tomorrow.
Conference organizers had hoped the crises with Iran and North Korea would
remain in the background this week. But the hardening rhetoric and actions on
all sides indicate the tensions are escalating and probably would dominate the
forum.
Diplomats from more than 180 countries will spend the next month reviewing the
treaty, which gives nations broad access to nuclear energy technology in
exchange for pledges to forgo nuclear weapons. The deal, signed in 1970, also
includes a commitment by the five original nuclear states -- the United States,
France, Britain, China and Russia -- to eventually eliminate their stockpiles.
The treaty is considered one of the most successful arms-control agreements
ever. But the basic bargain is often cited as its greatest flaw because
countries can peacefully get a pathway to bomb-building and then leave the NPT
without penalty, as North Korea did two years ago.
And although the NPT is credited with slowing the spread of nuclear weapons, it
has not stopped proliferation altogether or led to the eliminations originally
envisioned. Pakistan, India and Israel have not signed the pact, and there are
fears that more countries could opt out. Several solutions have been offered to
address the flaws, but there is no consensus on any. Delegates who have been
preparing for the conference for more than a year still have not agreed on an
agenda for the meeting.
As a result, the conference, which takes place every five years, is mired in
turmoil and comes as tensions are gathering over Iran and North Korea.
Yesterday, North Korea, which is now believed to have the means for at least
six nuclear weapons, unnerved its neighbors with a missile test in the Sea of
Japan. Over the weekend, Iranian officials said they could end a suspension of
their once-secret nuclear energy program unless there is some progress in talks
with Europe meant to resolve concerns about the country's growing nuclear
capabilities.
U.S. officials, who discussed the White House's strategy, said they did not
believe this conference would end with any agreements and instead braced for
confrontation and criticism. Bush last week chose harsh language to describe
his frustration with Tehran and Pyongyang. North Korea responded by calling
Bush "a philistine whom we can never deal with."
The U.S. speech, which will be delivered to conference delegates today, focuses
heavily on Iran and North Korea "in very tough language," said one U.S.
official, who agreed to discuss the details on the condition of anonymity. The
speech will also go over proposals Bush made in February 2004 but will not
offer any new ideas about how to deal with growing nuclear crises and will
avoid mention of a dozen nuclear commitments the United States signed on to,
along with other nations, at the previous review conference in 2000.
Those commitments, which focus on nuclear disarmament, have become touchstones
for nonnuclear states that say the United States is not honoring the treaty's
main purpose of eliminating nuclear weapons.
But the Bush administration said the 2000 commitments, which did not focus on
terrorism, a changed Middle East or a nuclear black market, are not relevant in
a world altered by the attacks on the United States a year later on Sept. 11,
2001.
Most critics of the administration's position agree that some of the
commitments are outdated and say the unilateral decision to walk away from a
set of ideas adopted by consensus weakens the treaty and the U.S. position.
"If the conference fails and the U.S. is seen as the reason for that failure,
it is going to be much harder for the United States to get the international
cooperation it needs to deal with Iran, to deal with North Korea and to deal
with all the other issues we are concerned about," said Joseph Cirincione, a
nuclear expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Cirincione said U.S. research into new nuclear weapons and new uses for nuclear
weapons, coupled with a refusal to ratify a treaty banning nuclear testing, has
led countries to doubt the U.S. commitment to the treaty. He said the United
States must lead by example if it expects others to sustain their pledges.
But the Bush administration has rejected that argument.
"This notion that the United States needs to make concessions in order to
encourage other countries to do what is necessary to preserve the nuclear
nonproliferation regime is at best a misguided way to think about the problems
confronting us," Stephen G. Rademaker, assistant secretary of state for arms
control, said in congressional testimony last week.
Rademaker, who was named to lead the U.S. delegation to the conference, said
the United States would use the meeting to focus on Iran's alleged
noncompliance with the treaty and North Korea's withdrawal from the agreement.
European officials have been concerned about U.S. aims at the conference,
saying a toughly worded speech or narrow focus on Iran could inflame rather
than alleviate tensions at a sensitive time in their negotiations with Tehran.
"The last thing we want is an inflammatory speech from either side," one senior
European official said.
Zarif said Iran plans to be firm on its rights under the treaty despite the
suspicions. "An attempt to make compliance the central issue of this conference
is a smoke screen designed to conceal the fact that there were decisions taken
at the previous conference, and adopted by consensus, for disarmament," he
said. "We know our rights."
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5F6XtA/.WnJAA/E2hLAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi-india.org
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:
1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru;
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
