[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #673: JENA-1812: Switch to Murmur3 for blank node allocation

2020-01-20 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #673: JENA-1812: Switch to Murmur3 for blank node allocation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/673#issuecomment-576153847 There are 4 implementations of Murmur3: There are 32 and 128 bit implementations both available in x86 and x64 variants. The x86

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #703: JENA-1853: Listen to localhost only

2020-03-04 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #703: JENA-1853: Listen to localhost only URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/703 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #703: JENA-1853: Listen to localhost only

2020-03-03 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #703: JENA-1853: Listen to localhost only URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/703 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-593541482 JENA-1837 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-593541482 [JENA-1837](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1837) This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-593541482 JENA-1837. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on a change in pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on a change in pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/702#discussion_r386576592 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-querybuilder/pom.xml ## @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ 3.15.0-SNAPSHOT

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #701: JENA-1843, JENA-1844: Fixes for OpAsQuery

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #701: JENA-1843, JENA-1844: Fixes for OpAsQuery URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/701 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name

2020-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/702 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #699: JENA-1850: Update Jetty version; make use of Shiro consistent

2020-02-27 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #699: JENA-1850: Update Jetty version; make use of Shiro consistent URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/699#issuecomment-592043004 Shiro 1.5.0 is needed (JENA-1836) so fixes needed first. Don't understand how the use of 1.2.6 isn't flagged.

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #701: JENA-1843, JENA-1844: Fixes for OpAsQuery

2020-02-28 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #701: JENA-1843, JENA-1844: Fixes for OpAsQuery URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/701 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1843 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1844

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name

2020-03-06 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #702: JENA-1852: Create sources-jar; add automatic module name URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/702 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #700: JENA-1850, JENA-1851: Upgrades

2020-03-06 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #700: JENA-1850, JENA-1851: Upgrades URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/700 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #693: JENA-1845: Complete the collection of "fn:*-from-*" functions

2020-03-06 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #693: JENA-1845: Complete the collection of "fn:*-from-*" functions URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/693 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #695: JENA-1758: Use a semaphore to notify thread has finished

2020-02-25 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #695: JENA-1758: Use a semaphore to notify thread has finished URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/695 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on a change in pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
osma commented on a change in pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#discussion_r370502927 ## File path: jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/servlets/ResponseDataset.java

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#issuecomment-578023916 Thanks for the quick review and approval @afs. I'll wait a few more days before merging, in case others want to comment.

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #676: JENA-1827: Fix thread safety issue with HashMaps in TypeMapper

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #676: JENA-1827: Fix thread safety issue with HashMaps in TypeMapper URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/676 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #676: JENA-1827: Fix thread safety issue with HashMaps in TypeMapper

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #676: JENA-1827: Fix thread safety issue with HashMaps in TypeMapper URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/676#issuecomment-577659539 The assumption that null is not registered is correct. This is

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #677: Cleanup

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #677: Cleanup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/677 Various small things seen in passing while investigating users@ emails. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #680: JENA-1829: Upgrade parent POM; drop old fix to resources-plugin

2020-01-26 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #680: JENA-1829: Upgrade parent POM; drop old fix to resources-plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/680 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-26 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-578492446 ServiceLoader resource file added. I have put in a test although it is test setup dependent (both "simple" and "jena" implementations are in-scope).

[GitHub] [jena] galbiston commented on a change in pull request #674: Geosparql precision fixes

2020-01-27 Thread GitBox
galbiston commented on a change in pull request #674: Geosparql precision fixes URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/674#discussion_r371428372 ## File path: jena-geosparql/pom.xml ## @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ org.apache.maven.plugins

[GitHub] [jena] galbiston merged pull request #674: Geosparql precision fixes

2020-01-27 Thread GitBox
galbiston merged pull request #674: Geosparql precision fixes URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/674 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #683: JENA-1832: Default max heap size setting

2020-01-29 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #683: JENA-1832: Default max heap size setting URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/683 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-29 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681#issuecomment-579943030 I'll leave the decision to you. After all, the next person to read it may well be future-you!

[GitHub] [jena] grahamtriggs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-29 Thread GitBox
grahamtriggs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681#issuecomment-58313 I've simplified the test slightly by removing a couple of unnecessary patterns, and cleaned it up by

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681#issuecomment-580222557 @grahamtriggs - thank you! This is an automated

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#issuecomment-580195080 Would you like me to merge this? This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#issuecomment-580225161 @afs Sure, you can merge this, thanks! I could probably do that myself too but I haven't done this for awhile and I think the processes

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-02-04 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-581984607 I'm not very familiar with `SurroundQueryParser` as I haven't used it myself, but I take it that making it possible to set the `maxBasicQueries` parameter is important to some

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#issuecomment-580282537 Yes, it's changed. Press the big green button, resolve or update the JIRA ticket. Now that the GH and the ASF repos are both

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580734610 1,2,3 - yes. And thanks for the PR to the PR branch. (I had forgotten automatic-module-name isn't inherited from the parent POM, requiring

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580737925 Re: OSGi - either way is fine by me. I wasn't sure if you wanted to keep the commonsrdf module separate, since it's part of `-extras`, but putting it

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580821336 > For OSGi, my mild preference is to put it in apache-jena-osgi so that all OSGi related stuff is together. Yes, that makes sense > Would

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580820538 I wasn't expecting it to be used quite so quickly! "jena-extras" has morphed a bit; it is not a few bits and pieces of interest, it's "things one

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn opened a new pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
acoburn opened a new pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684 This adds the commonsrdf project to the jena-osgi bundle Tested with Karaf 4.2.6 This is

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-581162427 @osma : when convenient, could you review this please? I tried to add you as a reviewer but your GH name wasn't an option. On epossibility is that your account isn't

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #685: JENA-1834: Mark Fuseki server scripts executable

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #685: JENA-1834: Mark Fuseki server scripts executable URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/685 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581162053 I am encountering a problem with this. mvn: 3.6.3 The commons-rdf-api:tests artifact does not have a version and the commons-rdf-simple

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581175716 Interesting. I thought the `dependencyManagement` would have taken care of this, but I've adjusted the PR to be more explicit about the commons

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#discussion_r374011769 ## File path: apache-jena-osgi/jena-osgi/pom.xml ## @@ -232,6 +239,11 @@ org.apache.commons

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#discussion_r374012926 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -575,12 +575,6 @@ ${ver.commonscli} - Review comment:

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581331053 It is `test` items causing build problems. The default scope dependencyManagement works fine. This is the set of changes after the

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580453505 FYI, OSGi support can be added by using this maven configuration (in place of the `maven-jar-plugin` above -- that would no longer be needed):

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-580427328 I took a medium-sized codebase that uses `commons-rdf-jena` pretty extensively, and converted it to the CommonsRDF implementation here. The conversion

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581565915 Thanks for the feedback. This PR should now be in line with your suggestions.

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #669: MaxBasicQueries URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/669#issuecomment-581454597 @afs Sure thing, will review soon. Just setting up the account linking, thanks for reminding. This is an

[GitHub] [jena] superfell opened a new pull request #686: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
superfell opened a new pull request #686: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn merged pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
acoburn merged pull request #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #686: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-04 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #686: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686#discussion_r374598318 ## File path: jena-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/datatypes/DatatypeFormatException.java

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581184950 I should have been clearer - the build problem I'm getting is in the jena-commonsrdf module. Didn't get to jena-osgi because jena-commonsrdf didn't

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #689: JENA-1839: Upgrade to Apache Commons CSV 1.8

2020-02-08 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #689: JENA-1839: Upgrade to Apache Commons CSV 1.8 URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/689 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #688: JENA-1838: Updates to PrefixMap

2020-02-08 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #688: JENA-1838: Updates to PrefixMap URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/688 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1838 Significant changes: * Remove use of `IRI` in the `PrefixMap` interface * Remove use of `IRI` in the `ParserProfile`

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #689: JENA-1839: Upgrade to Apache Commons CSV 1.8

2020-02-08 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #689: JENA-1839: Upgrade to Apache Commons CSV 1.8 URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/689 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #677: Cleanup

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #677: Cleanup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/677 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370906213 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370940227 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/README.md ## @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# commonsrdf-jena + +Code showing using [Apache

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370940225 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/README.md ## @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# commonsrdf-jena + +Code showing using [Apache

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370940136 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370940369 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] [jena] kinow commented on a change in pull request #677: Cleanup

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
kinow commented on a change in pull request #677: Cleanup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/677#discussion_r370326046 ## File path: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/RDFParser.java ## @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ private final ErrorHandler errorHandler;

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370907652 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/README.md ## @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# commonsrdf-jena + +Code showing using

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370907615 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/README.md ## @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# commonsrdf-jena + +Code showing using

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-24 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on a change in pull request #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#discussion_r370907492 ## File path: jena-extras/jena-commonsrdf/pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-578427957 >> I would absolutely use this once it becomes part of a release > Which way round Jena operating as the CommonsRDF provider, or Jena code

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation

2020-01-25 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #679: JENA-1828: CommonsRDF implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/679#issuecomment-578430011 It would also be nice if this code had a `./src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.commons.rdf.api.RDF` file containing this line:

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681#issuecomment-579309518 I'm thinking that anyone looking back on this in the future may want to understand it and the test case is the

[GitHub] [jena] kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682#discussion_r371765767 ## File path: .travis.yml ## @@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ install: true script: mvn -B clean install jdk: - openjdk8

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682#discussion_r371858480 ## File path: .travis.yml ## @@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ install: true script: mvn -B clean install jdk: - openjdk8 -

[GitHub] [jena] grahamtriggs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
grahamtriggs commented on issue #681: JENA-1831: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681#issuecomment-579323080 In theory, it might be possible to cut the WHERE clause down to the following: WHERE {

[GitHub] [jena] grahamtriggs opened a new pull request #681: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
grahamtriggs opened a new pull request #681: Fix SDB transform issue with using UNION in restrincting a query URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/681 Encountered a case using a UNION in a query to select e.g. objects where type is asserted as X, Y or Z (but not A, B, C, etc.)

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] [jena] kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682#discussion_r372118586 ## File path: .travis.yml ## @@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ install: true script: mvn -B clean install jdk: - openjdk8

[GitHub] [jena] kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
kinow commented on a change in pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682#discussion_r372118586 ## File path: .travis.yml ## @@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ install: true script: mvn -B clean install jdk: - openjdk8

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup

2020-01-29 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #682: JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/682 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #683: JENA-1832: Default max heap size setting

2020-01-29 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #683: JENA-1832: Default max heap size setting URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/683 Sets Fuseki server (full server) to 4G, up from 1.2G or 2G. [JENA-1832](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1832)

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #677: Cleanup

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #677: Cleanup URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/677#discussion_r370378020 ## File path: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/RDFParser.java ## @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ private final ErrorHandler errorHandler;

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#discussion_r370378457 ## File path: jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/servlets/ResponseDataset.java

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/687 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/687#issuecomment-582386821 Good to hear you saw it. On another project (much smaller), I have enabled `dependabot` which sends PRs for upgrades. It works for simple cases,

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686#issuecomment-581977706 Recorded as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1835, changed the PR title.

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686#issuecomment-581977706 Recorded as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1835, changed the PR title. @superfell -

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #687: JENA-1836: Update Apache Shiro to 1.5.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/687 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [jena] superfell commented on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException

2020-02-05 Thread GitBox
superfell commented on issue #686: JENA-1835: Capture and expose lexicalForm and dataType in DatatypeFormatException URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/686#issuecomment-582469549 @afs My Jira username is sfell This is

[GitHub] [jena] acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi

2020-02-02 Thread GitBox
acoburn commented on issue #684: JENA-1833: Add jena-commonsrdf to jena-osgi URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684#issuecomment-581216184 Does that [last commit](https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/684/commits/737a6e0800cf102ac087ee81df8123dcff5d9fb0) work for you? I upgraded to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #685: JENA-1836: Mark Fuseki server scripts executable

2020-02-01 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #685: JENA-1836: Mark Fuseki server scripts executable URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/685 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses

2020-01-30 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #678: JENA-1826: use plain RDF/XML in Fuseki RDF responses URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/678#issuecomment-580282537 Yes, it's changed. Press the big green button, update the JITA ticket. Now that the GH and the ASF repos are both write mode, and

[GitHub] [jena] galbiston opened a new pull request #692: Malformed geo lat lon checks

2020-02-17 Thread GitBox
galbiston opened a new pull request #692: Malformed geo lat lon checks URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/692 - multiple cases of geo:lat or geo:lon now result in an exception and closure of iterators. - geo:lat and geo:lon made required properties.

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #692: GeoSPARQL: Malformed geo:lat and geo:lon checks

2020-02-19 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #692: GeoSPARQL: Malformed geo:lat and geo:lon checks URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/692#discussion_r381268816 ## File path: jena-geosparql/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/geosparql/geo/topological/SpatialObjectGeometryLiteral.java

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #691: JENA-1840: Add --syntax to tdbloader (TDB1 and TDB2)

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #691: JENA-1840: Add --syntax to tdbloader (TDB1 and TDB2) URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/691#discussion_r382046412 ## File path: jena-cmds/src/main/java/tdb2/tdbloader.java ## @@ -92,6 +97,17 @@ else if (

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #691: JENA-1840: Add --syntax to tdbloader (TDB1 and TDB2)

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #691: JENA-1840: Add --syntax to tdbloader (TDB1 and TDB2) URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/691#discussion_r382075823 ## File path: jena-cmds/src/main/java/tdb2/tdbloader.java ## @@ -92,6 +97,17 @@ else if (

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #693: JENA-1845: Complete the collection of "fn:*-from-*" functions

2020-02-21 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #693: JENA-1845: Complete the collection of "fn:*-from-*" functions URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/693 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #694: JENA-1842: Cleanup of use of System.err.print

2020-02-21 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #694: JENA-1842: Cleanup of use of System.err.print URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/694 Not a full cleanup. Only things that were "obviously" not right removed as well as comments System.err that were very old. Use of System.err in command

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #690: JENA-1005: Isolate log4j1 usage in tests.

2020-02-11 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #690: JENA-1005: Isolate log4j1 usage in tests. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/690 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >