Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --On 11. Mai 2008 22:54:37 -0700 Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have a client with a Plone 2.5 site running ATManagedFile. The are >> using version 1.0.8 or 1.1.0, I can't tell since both have 1.0.8 in >> the versiont.txt file. :) They want to migrate Plone 3. For my >> part, since Plone 3.1 is such a smooth upgrade, I'd like to take them >> straight to 3.1. >> >> Are there any plans to update ATManagedFile and its dependencies for >> Plone 3? If so, what's the schedule? If not, is there any interest >> in doing so? I would be able to contribute to the update depending >> on the scale. Does anyone have a sense of what would be required to >> update to Plone 3? > > No idea about the schedule for ATManagedFile but consider moving to > ZODB blob support or using FileSystemStorage. Replacing ATManagedFile > with FileSystemStorage should be easy with a small migration script - > with the benefits that you could re-use the standard File type without > introducing a new content-type at this point.
Ah! Excellent suggestion. Thanks. Ross _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list Product-Developers@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
