Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Le 24/07/2017 16:57, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com a écrit : Should I use the WWWC forum instead? NO ! I only read Profox and I want to be 'aware' of FIC ! The [FIC] prefix is sufficient for those who want to filter this part of the list ... The Foxil

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Should I use the WWWC forum instead? On 2017-07-24 06:27, Thierry Nivelet wrote: Mike, another point: if you don't mind, make sure to follow up on the hint and solutions we provide here and/or by PM: it helps us sort out what is pending or not, and what needs more work. Thanks, Thierry

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Mike, another point: if you don't mind, make sure to follow up on the hint and solutions we provide here and/or by PM: it helps us sort out what is pending or not, and what needs more work. Thanks, Thierry Nivelet FoxInCloud Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

again, adapting code in test mode is probably not a good idea test mode is only intended to make sure that, after automated adaptions, desktop application still works the same as usual. real adaptations should always be done in source mode we've emphasized this point in the notice by

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

> After running Step 2 in FAA, I reviewed the changes it said I had to make. Made nearly all of them. Be aware that, as you're running in test mode, FAA can override your changes at any time by re-copying the file into the test\ folder > I will say that when reviewing the file in FAA, it

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

On 2017-07-22 09:04, Richard Kaye wrote: As much as I love Profox, I'd definitely move the discussion over to the FiC forum on the Westwind message boards. https://support.west-wind.com/ West Wind Message Board support.west-wind.com Support Web site for West

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

July 22, 2017 1:23:26 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code Hi Thierry, Finally getting back to this. After running Step 2 in FAA, I reviewed the changes it said I had to make. Made nearly all of them. (Some didn't seem applicable...for example, no need to fla

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Hi Thierry, Finally getting back to this. After running Step 2 in FAA, I reviewed the changes it said I had to make. Made nearly all of them. (Some didn't seem applicable...for example, no need to flag my pathing in my variable declarations MyVar as MyClass of

Re: [FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Hi Mike, 1- yes, FAA replaces all WAIT by wWait() - you can let FAA do this replacement Reviewing the adaptations in the FAA grid (and the explanations below) will probably help you understand what FAA does and why. 2- provide the error you get so that we can find a fix. To get help, « I have

[FIC] Problems with Adapted code

Hi Thierry, As I mentioned last week, I'll post here so as to help educate ProFox on the product, using the [FIC] subject prefix. When I ran the latest adaptation assistant, I made the C:\TEST folder (and subfolders) all read-write to remove the readonly errors I had prior. As per