I don't know if the results of this article are true or not, but here's
what I found when Googling:
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/lowercase/
On 01/19/2012 05:58 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
Aaah...now THAT makes sense! hahaha
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Kevin Cully
kcu...@cullytechnologies.com wrote:
I don't know if the results of this article are true or not, but here's
what I found when Googling:
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/lowercase/
Single percentage point performance differences may
I don't know if the results of this article are true or not, but
here's
what I found when Googling:
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/lowercase/
I guess I just don't get it
If I was consistent w/ my tags being uppercase, why wouldn't it be the
same compression size as if
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jarvis, Matthew mat...@mckweb.com wrote:
I guess I just don't get it
If I was consistent w/ my tags being uppercase, why wouldn't it be the
same compression size as if using all lowercase?? If it's found the
value, it's found the value and doesn't have
I'd like to throw in another aspect to this discussion.
Some may be thinking 2%! What's the big deal. However, if your web
site is in an ultra competitive industry, now that Google ranks sites on
how fast they load, a 2% decrease in web size may give you an edge over
a competitor that isn't
On 1/20/12 8:45 AM, Jarvis, Matthew wrote:
Or was Paul not joking like I thought he was when he mentioned the ASCII
values being higher/lower than the other?
I was joking.
However, since then I've looked at the bit settings of the ascii values, and at
first
glance there do appear to be more
Didn't know that. After a quick Googling, it appears that there's two
benefits:
1) Better compatibility if needing to change between HTML and XHTML
2) Site compression is better by around 2% if using all lowercase tags.
I love learning stuff.
On 01/19/2012 11:24 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
On 1/19/2012 1:56 PM, Kevin Cully wrote:
2) Site compression is better by around 2% if using all lowercase tags.
Cool. Wonder why?
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
On 1/19/12 2:17 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
On 1/19/2012 1:56 PM, Kevin Cully wrote:
2) Site compression is better by around 2% if using all lowercase tags.
Cool. Wonder why?
Lowercase letters have higher ASCII values. The higher the ASCII value, the
more bits
to compress.
On 1/19/12 2:50 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
On 1/19/12 2:17 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
On 1/19/2012 1:56 PM, Kevin Cully wrote:
2) Site compression is better by around 2% if using all lowercase tags.
Cool. Wonder why?
Lowercase letters have higher ASCII values. The higher the ASCII
On 1/19/2012 5:50 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
On 1/19/12 2:17 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
On 1/19/2012 1:56 PM, Kevin Cully wrote:
2) Site compression is better by around 2% if using all lowercase tags.
Cool. Wonder why?
Lowercase letters have higher ASCII values. The higher the
On 1/19/2012 5:54 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
Joking aside, I bet that it doesn't come to lower case versus upper case, but
rather
consistent case versus inconsistent case. IOW, pick either upper or lower,
and stick
with it consistently. That way the compression algorithm has more redundant
12 matches
Mail list logo
