http://www.codeplex.com/IronPythonStudio
This is a free Python IDE based upon the VS 2008 shell. It's the same
idea as Craig Boyd's recent Visual Foxpro efforts in the same area,
except this lets you use Python to create GUI applications using Windows
Forms, just like VB.Net or C#. Presumably
Alan Bourke wrote:
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPythonStudio
This is a free Python IDE based upon the VS 2008 shell. It's the same
idea as Craig Boyd's recent Visual Foxpro efforts in the same area,
except this lets you use Python to create GUI applications using Windows
Forms, just like
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:36 -0700, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But beware: your GUI code will require .NET/Mono
Well, if it's Mono you won't be tied to a platform. But the WinForms
implementation is a long way from complete in Mono.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13, 2008 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] IronPython Studio
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPythonStudio
This is a free Python IDE based upon the VS 2008 shell. It's the same
idea as Craig Boyd's recent Visual Foxpro efforts in the same area,
except this lets you use Python to create GUI
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:36 -0700, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But beware: your GUI code will require .NET/Mono
Well, if it's Mono you won't be tied to a platform. But the WinForms
implementation is a long way from complete in Mono.
And you don't get native
Paul M¢Nett wrote:
.NET really doesn't bring anything to
Python, other than exposure.
And a RAD tool for building desktop applications, even if they are tied
to Windows. Not a lot of those around for Python, cross-platform or not ;)
___
Post
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:36 -0700, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But beware: your GUI code will require .NET/Mono
Well, if it's Mono you won't be tied to a platform. But the WinForms
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:36 -0700, Paul M¢Nett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
But beware: your GUI code will require
Bill Anderson wrote:
Whoa, whoa, whoa, stop right there
Microsoft has publicly stated that companies where throwing out their
mission critical applications *sight unseen* for beta versions of .NET 1.0.
.NET 1.0 is **revolutionary**, as has been repeatedly stated. Why would
MSFT run away
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoa, whoa, whoa, stop right there
Microsoft has publicly stated that companies where throwing out their
mission critical applications *sight unseen* for beta versions of .NET 1.0
.
.NET 1.0 is **revolutionary**,
Stephen Russell wrote:
In .NET we have 1, 1.3, 2, 3, and 3.5 and it has gotten better with each
release.
lol...Steve, of COURSE it has gotten better with each release...why
wouldn't it?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Has anyone used it? Ed or Paul, perhaps? If so, do you have a gut
feeling or more regarding its stability?
We are considering using it as an embedded scripting language in our
.NET 2.0 app.
Thanks,
Eyvind.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
From: Eyvind Axelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone used it? Ed or Paul, perhaps? If so, do you have a gut
feeling or more regarding its stability?
We are considering using it as an embedded scripting language in our
.NET 2.0 app.
There is a Yahoogroup on it, but it gets little to any
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Eyvind Axelsen wrote:
Has anyone used it? Ed or Paul, perhaps? If so, do you have a gut
feeling or more regarding its stability?
We are considering using it as an embedded scripting language in our
.NET 2.0 app.
I don't use it, since I don't work in .Net. But
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Eyvind Axelsen wrote:
Do you have any specifics as to what is missing?
No, but I remember the discussions when it first began development
at Microsoft. It wasn't designed to be a complete re-write of Python,
since Python already runs great on Windows, but
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Ed Leafe
It wasn't designed to be a complete re-write of Python,
since Python already runs great on Windows, but rather a wrapping of
the .Net classes.
Actually, I think you are wrong on that (maybe
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Eyvind Axelsen wrote:
IronPython is the code name of the new implementation of the
Python programming language running on .NET. It supports an
interactive console with fully dynamic compilation. It is well
integrated with the rest of the .NET Framework and
17 matches
Mail list logo
