Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-16 Thread Alan Bourke
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012, at 08:50 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: If I heard right (on LinkedIn iirc), Servoy might be a good choice given your POV on how they charge. No personal experience. They have a free edition which is exactly the same as the paid one, except it only allows a few

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-15 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
On 11/13/2012 11:14 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote: I would like an application that would not charge the developer when he is developing. Now if and when I sell the product of my development then I could be charged. I think that way we could try several products till we find the best for us.

[NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kevin Cully
Kurt, I hope that I haven't oversold Real Studio / RealBasic. For Windows only desktop applications, I still think that VFP has the edge in development. However, for being able to develop one application and compile for Windows, Mac, and Linux desktop applications, then it is the best tool

RE: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Dave Crozier
Full agreement here on RealBasic, both it's pro's and also its cons. I just treat it as another tool in the developers arsenal and at multi platform it is certainly the best one click multi compile solution I have found. I think all the comments regarding VFP and it's future bring into

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Eurico Chagas Filho
days trial is not enough. E. From: Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface) Full agreement here on RealBasic, both it's pro's

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kurt @ VR-FX
Hey Kevin, On 11/13/2012 9:29 AM, Kevin Cully wrote: Kurt, I hope that I haven't oversold Real Studio / RealBasic. For Windows only desktop applications, I still think that VFP has the edge in development. Overselling sounds fine by me - nothing wrong with being a RealBasic Evangelist!

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kurt @ VR-FX
Hey Dave - thanks again for your input. I agree with your 1 horse comment - and hope that I CAN get this New project - and CAN use this as the perfect opportunity to get a new tool under my belt! L8r, -K- On 11/13/2012 9:39 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Full agreement here on RealBasic, both it's

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kevin Cully
Hello Eurico, The Real Studio pricing model is going to change with the next release. The IDE is going to be free from that point on. You only need to pay if you want to compile the application. In fact, you can develop and application, distribute it to your customer and they can run it

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kurt @ VR-FX
, November 13, 2012 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface) Full agreement here on RealBasic, both it's pro's and also its cons. I just treat it as another tool in the developers arsenal and at multi platform it is certainly the best one click multi compile solution I

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Ed Leafe
On Nov 13, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho e28cha...@yahoo.com.br wrote: I would like an application that would not charge the developer when he is developing. Now if and when I sell the product of my development then I could be charged. I think that way we could try several products

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kevin Cully
On 11/13/2012 11:16 AM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: When you say Non-UI, what does that really mean? Only the data processing and manipulation routines can be shared? Yes. The UI elements are specific to the various platforms so interfacing with them wouldn't cross over. However, developing for a

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Eurico Chagas Filho
Great Kevin. I don't  mind distributing riches. If I sell I will compile and gladly pay for it. E.  From: Kevin Cully kcu...@cullytechnologies.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:19 PM Subject: Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Eurico Chagas Filho
. From: Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface) On Nov 13, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho e28cha...@yahoo.com.br wrote: I would

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Eurico Chagas Filho
: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:56 PM Subject: Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface) On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho e28cha...@yahoo.com.br wrote: I would like an application that would not charge the developer when he is developing. Now if and when I sell the product

Re: [NF] RealBasic (was Re: VFP Metro Interface)

2012-11-13 Thread Kurt @ VR-FX
Hey Kevin, Thanks again for all your extensive input - I really appreciate your taking the time to reply. And, yes, I think a 3-day trial is sufficient for my purposes! Regards, Kurt On 11/13/2012 11:57 AM, Kevin Cully wrote: On 11/13/2012 11:16 AM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: When you say