On 4/2/07, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In answer to Michael Madigan's "Why would someone develop another
> browser?" here's yet another example of why "because IE hasn't shown
> itself to be secure enough for daily use."
>
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6172440.html?t
=>
=> Yeah They named it wrong. LOL
=>
=> --- MB Software Solutions
No, that was the plane that flew according to what you were thinking (in
Russian).
B+
HALinNY
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mai
Yeah They named it wrong. LOL
--- MB Software Solutions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > Of course if Foxfire passes IE in popularity, all
> the
> > hackers will start to write for Foxfire.
> >
>
> FoxFire, FireFoxyou say potato, Dan Quail says
> potatoe.
>
> -
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Of course if Foxfire passes IE in popularity, all the
> hackers will start to write for Foxfire.
>
FoxFire, FireFoxyou say potato, Dan Quail says potatoe.
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Wo
A simpler solution would be to cut the hands off all
the hackers.
Oh, then someone will invent an handless keyboard.
--- "Whil Hentzen (Pro*)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > Of course if Foxfire passes IE in popularity, all
> the
> > hackers will start to write for Fox
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Of course if Foxfire passes IE in popularity, all the
> hackers will start to write for Foxfire.
Until they find that the architecture isn't quite as, er, friendly to
attacks. Not immune, but not the swiss-cheese framework that IE is built
upon..
And when that happens..
>
>
> Gil
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Ed Leafe
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:02 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [NF] Visting selected sites with
Isn't it a windows flaw and not an IE flaw?
--- "Whil Hentzen (Pro*)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> mrgmhale wrote:
> > Unbelieveable! Just when a person starts to feel
> M$ has stepped up security
> > almost enough to begin coming closer to not
> feeling a sense of misplaced
> > trust, then POW
AIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Visting selected sites with IE 6 or 7 infects your
> machine
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:20 AM, mrgmhale wrote:
>
> > My greatest fear is passing an infection to a client, my 2nd greatest
> > fear is losing data, my 3rd greatest fear is getti
>
> That's kinda how I feel about Windows in general. :)
>
Touche'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:20 AM, mrgmhale wrote:
> My greatest fear is passing an infection to a client, my 2nd greatest
> fear is losing data, my 3rd greatest fear is getting infected
> despite all
> the protections I have in place. And all those fears are just
> about at the
> same level.
mrgmhale wrote:
> Unbelieveable! Just when a person starts to feel M$ has stepped up security
> almost enough to begin coming closer to not feeling a sense of misplaced
> trust, then POW! This kind of article comes up. For Lynda and I the mantra
> around here is "FireFox where you can, IE only w
(Pro*)
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [NF] Visting selected sites with IE 6 or 7 infects your machine
>
>
> In answer to Michael Madigan's "Why would someone develop another
> browser?" here's yet another example
In answer to Michael Madigan's "Why would someone develop another
browser?" here's yet another example of why "because IE hasn't shown
itself to be secure enough for daily use."
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6172440.html?tag=nl.e589
Whil
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
