Just in time for Outlook 2010:
http://www.hentzenwerke.com/fun/outlook2010.jpg
How could I do a text search over the captions in this screen? :)
--
.~.http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.17.6
/( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.06) 22:11:01 up 12 days 5:34
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 19:43
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Windows 2010
Just in time for Outlook 2010:
http://www.hentzenwerke.com/fun/outlook2010.jpg
Whil
On Jul 28, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
Have you seen the new Office beta? Take a look at Word or Excel -
you're gonna freak out :-)
Yeah, this is an excellent opportunity for businesses to switch to
OOo - the interface is *much* more like the one that users are
familiar with.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 11:25
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Windows 2010
On Jul 28, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
Have you seen the new Office beta? Take a look at Word
Paul Hill wrote:
Have you seen the new Office beta? Take a look at Word or Excel -
you're gonna freak out :-)
in a good way?
--
Thanks,
--Michael
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
I think this is a very risky move made by Microsoft. The new interface is
too different from the previous releases. I don't think they made this
(just) for innovation, probably they wanted to differentiate Office from OOo
for good...
On 7/28/06, Michael Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul
On 7/28/06, Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a very risky move made by Microsoft. The new interface is
too different from the previous releases. I don't think they made this
(just) for innovation, probably they wanted to differentiate Office from OOo
for good...
I'm reserving
Paul Hill wrote:
On 7/28/06, Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a very risky move made by Microsoft. The new
interface is
too different from the previous releases. I don't think they made this
(just) for innovation, probably they wanted to differentiate Office
from OOo
for
On 7/28/06, Michael Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaah, more revenue for the training folks. M$ keeps the bucks rolling
in for service providers. ;-)
And a PITA for us developers. Our custom reports (Word mail merge)
feature has stopped working...
--
Paul
Michael Babcock wrote:
Ever since I saw inconsistencies across the versions, I tried to steer
clear of MailMerges. If there was consistency from application
providers, that'd be great, but that seems to be contrary to their
desires.
Not to mention M$ dropping support for the ODBC and the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 15:10
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Windows 2010
On 7/27/06, KAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just heard on CNBC that some people inside Microsoft are 'quietly
At this point development cycle of Vista is longer than the LIFE cycle of
Windows 95. ;)
Ls
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted Roche
Well, isn't 2010 when SP2 is due out? It should be usable by then...
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Lou Syracuse wrote:
At this point development cycle of Vista is longer than the LIFE
cycle of Windows 95. ;)
Just in time for Outlook 2010:
http://www.hentzenwerke.com/fun/outlook2010.jpg
That looked like my first FPW interface. Can I squeeze it all in?
13 matches
Mail list logo
