On Friday 25 May 2007 3:26 pm, Derek Kalweit wrote:
Sh!t like that makes me just want to vote anti-incumbent every time.
But still for one of the 2 major parties, I'm sure. And so the
pendulum swings-- left then right, left then right. Too bad we can't
just vote for someone in the
Who are we fighting in Iraq? Terrorists, not the
Iraqi Army.
If we surrender in Iraq like the Democrats want us to
do, they'll set up more terrorist training camps
there.
--- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Madigan,
And if you don't like paying for the Iraq War at
300
On 5/25/07, MB Software Solutions General Account
Yes, but were they MADE by the dentist? I only buy clothes made by my
fellow US brothers and sisters. (yeah rightgood luck finding them
on the store shelves...you'll have to go naked instead!)
MB: If the stores that you patronize don't
Ted Roche wrote:
On 5/25/07, MB Software Solutions General Account
Yes, but were they MADE by the dentist? I only buy clothes made by my
fellow US brothers and sisters. (yeah rightgood luck finding them
on the store shelves...you'll have to go naked instead!)
MB: If the
This was an emergency appropriation. This money would
have never been spent on anything in the US, nor would
it have been in your pocket since taxes haven't been
raised to pay for it.
Wars and natural disasters are things that can't be
planned for, yet must be paid for.
And if you don't like
Michael Madigan wrote:
This was an emergency appropriation. This money would
have never been spent on anything in the US, nor would
it have been in your pocket since taxes haven't been
raised to pay for it.
Wars and natural disasters are things that can't be
planned for, yet must be paid
3 hours? Don't get in a car and drive.
I agree. We should be taking their oil until it's
paid for.
Touche! I'm exhausted today (only 3 hrs sleep last
night) so yes, I
probably forgot or wasn't 100% sharp when I replied.
STILL, I cannot
believe that we simply GAVE AWAY that money. It
Michael Madigan wrote:
Yep.
I think a 2 senate terms and 4 congressional terms
should be it.
Now don't get me wrong...I don't want it to be like Israel. From what I
see, those people are always voting no confidence in the leadership
almost annually.
The have a parliamentary style of governent, though.
--- MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Yep.
I think a 2 senate terms and 4 congressional terms
should be it.
Now don't get me wrong...I don't want it to be like
Israel.
Derek Kalweit wrote:
Sh!t like that makes me just want to vote anti-incumbent every time.
But still for one of the 2 major parties, I'm sure. And so the
pendulum swings-- left then right, left then right. Too bad we can't
just vote for someone in the middle...
Right...this 2 party
On Friday 25 May 2007 3:02 pm, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Yep.
I think a 2 senate terms and 4 congressional terms
should be it.
Now don't get me wrong...I don't want it to be like Israel. From what I
see, those people are always voting no
Sh!t like that makes me just want to vote anti-incumbent every time.
But still for one of the 2 major parties, I'm sure. And so the
pendulum swings-- left then right, left then right. Too bad we can't
just vote for someone in the middle...
Right...this 2 party system sucks. I don't
Michael Madigan wrote:
3 hours? Don't get in a car and drive.
I agree. We should be taking their oil until it's
paid for.
I know you're a Bush man, but that deal reeks of a political favor of a
bush (read: bullshit) type.
Sh!t like that makes me just want to vote anti-incumbent every
13 matches
Mail list logo
