Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-12 Thread Stephen Russell
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: 6% --- What do you say to the company in Detroit that cannot find anyone talented enough for the position who has not moved out of the Detroit area nor who would consider moving to Detroit? -- Stephen

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-12 Thread Michael Madigan
Detroit is loaded with talent. LOL --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic) To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Michael Madigan
I worked for a company where they paid this Indian girl crap yet she had to stay there for the VISA. End all foreign work VISAs as long as we have 10% unemployment Pete's not far off from the truth, though, Steve.  The Indians do more for less, so why shouldn't the American IT worker? 

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Stephen Russell
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I worked for a company where they paid this Indian girl crap yet she had to stay there for the VISA. End all foreign work VISAs as long as we have 10% unemployment -- For grins what is the acceptable

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Michael Madigan
6% --- On Sun, 10/11/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic) To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 6:27 PM