lol
Being non religious I call OT on happy Christmas messages
Also just kidding.
Al
-Original Message-
Just pulling your leg in defense of those times when I am called out for
non-[OT]
Nicholas Geti
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
S
Just pulling your leg in defense of those times when I am called out for
non-[OT]
Nicholas Geti
- Original Message -
From: "Allen"
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This?
I would think NF but not OT myself
Al
-Origin
I would think NF but not OT myself
Al
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Geti
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Hey. Where is the [OT]? Please.
___
Post Messages to
Hey. Where is the [OT]? Please.
- Original Message -
From: "M Jarvis"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This?
>
Store says perfect shopper here, carry on.
Ya know, not trying to go all paranoid here, but some day they ar
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bob Lee wrote:
> I am afraid. Is already here.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_basket_analysis
> Marketers track everything they can about you already.
>
beer and diapers?? trust me, I don't drink THAT much
--
Matt Jarvis
Eugene, Oregon USA
___
PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This?
>
> Store says perfect shopper here, carry on.
>
Ya know, not trying to go all paranoid here, but some day they are going to
be able to aggregate all our data... where and when we shop, what we buy,
how much...
Bought lau
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Bob Lee wrote:
> Its really not different than what Target does, by using the hidden
> camera's
> watching how long each of us spend in the various isles, knowing what the
> normal path is though their maze of a store.
>
I'd like to see them track *my* shopping p
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
> > We are being watched, in stores, why not for our activities on
> > line. ?
>
Well, the assumption there is that being watched in stores is a good
thing, for anything other than in-store security reasons.
Ok, I see - so it picks up a graphic (I'm guessing 1 pixel will do) from
a website which logs the visit (like you see Google doing repeatedly).
Shouldn't be too difficult to script, I might play around with that.
AndyD 8-)#
On 20/12/2012 22:58, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at
> We are being watched, in stores, why not for our activities on
> line. ?
I'm not thrilled about being tracked that way in stores, or about
having my purchases tracked and analyzed. I feel the same way online,
where I (should) have more control about what comes and goes from my
machine.
-J
xTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB
Software Solutions, LLC
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:05 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On 12/20/2012 10:27 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
>>
On 12/20/2012 10:27 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and Perdot
etc, have taken this concept to really interesting levels.
Where you can substitute "deeply disturbing" for "interesting."
ROFL
On 12/20/12 9:28 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> What this does is return a notification to the sender that the recipient
> has opened the mail, without any knowledge or intervention required by
> the recipient. Basically if you are the recipient and your mail client
> can display emails with embedded gra
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at 04:55 PM, AndyHC wrote:
> I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used
> had >option>return receipt.
>
What this does is return a notification to the sender that the recipient
has opened the mail, without any knowledge or intervention requir
Sure but most clients allow you to suppress the sending of same.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, AndyHC wrote:
> I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used
I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used
had >option>return receipt.
AndyD 8-)#
On 20/12/2012 21:04, Paul McNett wrote:
I guess javascript would have to be enabled in the email reader to track things
like
how long the email is open and where the mouse is hov
Pretty cool how it works - however if it's still using a hidden image
then it won't work for anyone who reads mail in text-only form, or has
auto download of images turned off, and so on.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: h
I guess javascript would have to be enabled in the email reader to track things
like
how long the email is open and where the mouse is hovering, etc.
On 12/20/12 6:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
> This technology has been around for years.
> Marketers use it every second, to track how many emails are op
So basically to read the message I need to follow a link to a website, right?
And how
is 'received' defined:
1) my email server received the message from readnotify.com
2) my email server scripts placed it in my inbox (as opposed to spam)
3) my email client program downloaded that messages header
This technology has been around for years.
Marketers use it every second, to track how many emails are opened and by
whom, how long the email remains open, if links are clicked..
Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and Perdot
etc, have taken this concept to really in
I'm not sure if I'm on same wavelength, but I use a system called ReadNotify
There are times when, for legal reasons, I need to be able to prove you
have received AND read my email.
I send the email tosome...@somewhere.readnotify.com
I then get a message when they've received it, and when they've
On 12/19/12 2:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> http://www.msgtag.com/home/
>
> It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user intervention.
I'm fairly certain that if someone sent me such a message, Thunderbird would
warn me
that it thinks the message is a scam..
Paul
Interesting Jeff! Although - I must say - this was my favorite part on
the website:
"A few MSGTAG users have even told us that they use read proof to figure
out who is serious on dating sites. Did she really not get the email, or
is she not that keen? With MSGTAG email tracking you now have read
23 matches
Mail list logo
