Hi Everybody,
http://away.com/hiking-guide/travel-ta-trekking-backpacking-cultural-immersion-australia-nature-hiking-sidwcmdev_050517.html
Australia’s Northern Territory is not for the faint of heart, and
Kakadu National Park is about as wild and relentless as the country’s
Red Center gets.
Hi Everybody,
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45743921/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
Somehow . . .
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011, at 04:16 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Dec 20, 2011, at 4:02 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
You should never store passwords. Instead, you should store a hash of
the password. When the user logs in, you hash the supplied password and
compare it to the stored
There was/is an old trick called irreversible encryption. It's used by
Unix/Linux, I believe.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:02 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
As you might have seen from a previous thread, I was looking at using
the checksum via
Hi John
Its too late for my main product but for future use I would like to see the
code please. I use two fields currently, one with the length in.
Al
-Original Message-
I have a routine which pads the password to a fixed length of, say, 20
characters with a standard string of
On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
There was/is an old trick called irreversible encryption. It's used by
Unix/Linux, I believe.
That's what hashing is: a one-way process that produces a value that
cannot be used to re-create the original.
-- Ed Leafe
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:04 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
Craig's site lists these options for the HASH:
1 = SHA1 (a.k.a SHA160)
2 = SHA256
3 = SHA384
4 = SHA512 *Default
5 = MD5
6 = RIPEMD128
7 = RIPEMD160
So your SHA-2 is most likely like #4, SHA512? So I store the 128 byte
The ones near the camera have been surgically enhanced.
- Original Message -
From: Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: [OT] Fleggaard ad
**
** Hi Everybody,
NSFW
Advert for Siemens
http://arstechnica.com/news/2011/12/how-hackers-gave-subway-a-30-million-lesson-in-point-of-sale-security.ars
--
Stephen Russell
901.246-0159 cell
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
U got THAT Right!
:-)
I don't feel SO bad about my mistake - since, its funny when I see
others do the same thing. Post a question for help - then respond back
to say that they figured it out - or admitted to making a mistake - that
caused the problem.
Thanks anyway!
-K-
On 12/21/2011 2:14
Kind of like yelling, :Where's the ketchup?, a microsecond before finding it
behind the milk.
From: Kurt @ VR-FX v...@optonline.net
To: profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Fun with LabelRIGHT...
U got THAT Right!
:-)
I
Craig's CRC function has a 2nd parameter for 16-bit or 32-bit. From his
help page:
---
The CRC that is returned is unsigned, which means that the returned
16-bit CRC needs to be treated as a 4 Byte numeric value and the 32-bit
CRC as a 8 byte numeric value in
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:09 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
However, when I run some tests, the resulting number is a 10-digit
numeric. Perhaps I'm mixing units here, but isn't that beyond 8-byte?
I mean, I've dealt with packed decimals years ago in Assembler, but when
he says 8-byte
Ed,
You showed the largest 4 byte number. Each FF is a single byte,
Fred
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:09 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
However, when I run some tests, the resulting number is a 10-digit
numeric. Perhaps
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
You showed the largest 4 byte number. Each FF is a single byte,
My bad - guess I mis-read that.
Then why would a max value of 18446744073709551615 show up in Fox as 10
digits?
-- Ed Leafe
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
You showed the largest 4 byte number. Each FF is a single byte,
My bad - guess I mis-read that.
Then why would a max value of 18446744073709551615 show up in Fox
On 12/21/2011 4:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:09 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
However, when I run some tests, the resulting number is a 10-digit
numeric. Perhaps I'm mixing units here, but isn't that beyond 8-byte?
I mean, I've dealt with packed decimals years ago in
If it's truly a 10 digit number, it may just be an unsigned 4 byte integer.
As long as the value doesn't exceed 4,294,967,295 that's all it is.
However, VFP stores signed integers, so yes, you would have to store it as
a N(10).
Fred
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
You could also store it as a float (f) or double (b)
CREATE CURSOR xyz (bignum f)
CREATE CURSOR xyz (bignum b)
CREATE CURSOR xyz (bignum n(10))
Fred
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 12/21/2011 4:21 PM, Ed
I really enjoyed reading it. You might too.
Interesting read, but I emailed Les about a fact problem. He mentioned Charles
Simonyi was a space tourist who launched
to the Mir space station. Charles actually visited the International Space
Station twice, not Mir. Mir was deorbited 6
years
Get a heads up on what is coming out next. Sure there is a fee.
http://app.tech.pentontech.com/e/es.aspx?s=1481e=104720elq=f9c19e81a84b4687998b1ac20dbc83a2
New features abound: a brand new user interface with an entirely new
application model, support for a new architecture that enables Windows
I defy anyone to recover the password from the stored value :-).
There is a big risk of collision using your method.
As the result set is composed of only 65128 different values,
it doesn't take a long time to input in the routine a string whose result
will be the same value as the stored one
On 12/21/2011 5:07 PM, Rick Schummer wrote:
I really enjoyed reading it. You might too.
Interesting read, but I emailed Les about a fact problem. He mentioned
Charles Simonyi was a space tourist who launched
to the Mir space station. Charles actually visited the International Space
Good catch. So where'd he go? Just up in the atmosphere or to the
International space station?
The ISS...
He even has his own website devoted to all that fun:
http://www.charlesinspace.com/
Thanks,
Matthew Jarvis || Business Systems Analyst
IT Department
McKenzie-Willamette Medical
On 12/21/2011 5:15 PM, Gérard Lochon wrote:
I defy anyone to recover the password from the stored value :-).
There is a big risk of collision using your method.
As the result set is composed of only 65128 different values,
it doesn't take a long time to input in the routine a string whose
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:33 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 12/21/2011 5:15 PM, Gérard Lochon wrote:
I defy anyone to recover the password from the stored value :-).
There is a big risk of collision using your method.
As the
From: MB Software Solutions
I defy anyone to recover the password from the stored value :-).
There is a big risk of collision using your method.
As the result set is composed of only 65128 different values,
it doesn't take a long time to input in the routine a string whose result
will be
Could you explain why there can only be 65128 different values? I still
maintain that it would be extremely difficult to recover the password from
the stored numerical value :-)
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com
On 12/21/2011 6:00 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_(computer_science)
Thanks, Fred.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16
On 12/21/2011 6:10 PM, John Weller wrote:
Could you explain why there can only be 65128 different values? I still
maintain that it would be extremely difficult to recover the password from
the stored numerical value :-)
He's not saying they could guess it; he's saying that my password and
On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:10 PM, John Weller wrote:
Could you explain why there can only be 65128 different values? I still
maintain that it would be extremely difficult to recover the password from
the stored numerical value :-)
That's a different issue than collision. With collision,
I wonder when people will learn that there are guys whose only job is to
think on these things. And the outcome cannot be beaten by in-house
solutions no matter what, first because they do that 8 hours a day, 5 days a
week. An inhouse solution simply cannot compete. Not to mention that usually
the
- Original Message -
From: John Weller j...@johnweller.co.uk
Could you explain why there can only be 65128 different values?
At the first turn , you have 256 seeding possibilities. You randomize.
Then you multiply this value (between 0 and 1) by an ascii code (between 0
and 255),
Since I wrote my last message (1h 10 minutes ago) I wrote a quick'n'dirty
program that looks for alternate strings. Guess what, it finds the string as
fast as even by SET DECIMALS TO 18 I couldn't measure the execution time.
I used my name as a password and padded it with ABCDE up to 20 chars
The ISS...
Yes, exactly as I mentioned in my original post. gdr fMB
BTW, Les appreciated the correction.
Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.
www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
No reason to think that he wouldn't. Unless he said it for other reasons.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Rick Schummer pro...@whitelightcomputing.com
wrote:
The ISS...
Yes, exactly
I've seen code samples for gmail, outlook, outlook express, etc, but
nothing for thunderbird.
Any ideas, how I would do it?
Mike
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
On 12/21/2011 6:12 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
That's a different issue than collision. With collision, you don't need
to know the original password; instead, you have a one in N chance of a
random string matching the password, where N is the total number of possible
values. So I could write
Nicholas Geti wrote:
The ones near the camera have been surgically enhanced.
Hi Nicholas,
How can you tell?
NSFW
Advert for Siemens dishwasher ..
Across Germany ’s northern border with Denmark you'll find an incredible
superstore called Fleggaard.
There, you can buy everything you
I am an expert. Notice when they first sat down and removed their tops.how
the top of each bulges up like a blown up balloon. They don't jiggle and on
the trip down I only saw one pair that was pulled down by gravity. The
others remained looking like stretched balloons and didn't show any wind
Nicholas Geti wrote:
I am an expert. Notice when they first sat down and removed their tops.how
the top of each bulges up like a blown up balloon. They don't jiggle and on
the trip down I only saw one pair that was pulled down by gravity. The
others remained looking like stretched balloons
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net wrote:
It was obviously geared strictly to men. The ad is real. Here is a link
to simply the best advertisement ever made.
http://www.m2film.dk/fleggaard/trailer2.swf
Geez! ... and a Merry Christmas one and all!
Ken
Well that opened my eyes, thanks guys! I wrote a quick and dirty test along
the lines of those suggested before I read any of the responses after
Gerard's initial one and was appalled at the results :-). What I thought
was reasonably secure is most definitely not! I also realised that my
Thanks Gerard, I should have thought it through a bit better :-)
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf
Of Gérard Lochon
Sent: 21 December 2011 23:58
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
On 12/21/2011 7:32 PM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
Since I wrote my last message (1h 10 minutes ago) I wrote a quick'n'dirty
program that looks for alternate strings. Guess what, it finds the string as
fast as even by SET DECIMALS TO 18 I couldn't measure the execution time.
I used my name as a
45 matches
Mail list logo
