On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:21:48 -0400, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Haven't tried it out, since we're not supporting Vista here (yet,
anyways),
It's available for XP as well though ... it can do some very cool things
but equally is pretty complicated.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ken Dibble wrote:
I thought that a separate .exe for printing,
running in its own thread, would force a fairer allocation of resources so
that things wouldn't bog down so much. This appears to be true.
Surely only on a multi-core CPU though, which won't be there on your
older systems?
Hi
Does anyone know of or have a DBC comparison tool? That would compare
the entire contents of two DBCs and associated tables, and list any
differences?
TIA ...
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
MB Software Solutions wrote:
This has to piss off M$, as it means less adoption (at this time) of its
Vista OS!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/ap_on_hi_te/dell_xp
I see they've slapped a Jan 2008 killswitch on XP for OEMs.
Oh well, I've just upgraded my XP laptop with an MSDN copy
Thanks Mike! Nice to see there are some other people out there still
dealing with FPW apps!
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
have to say I was looking at the pricing for MS Office Small
Business Edition in PC World yesterday and it is very expensive.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman
Presumably this is FoxPro 2.x
You need to build the EXE with debugging information, and save generated
code. Open up the project, then from the 'Project' option at the top
menu select 'Options', and the options are in there.
What I tend to do is do the above, then put a SET STEP ON in the code
He probably just dug up the rant he had when XP came out, and did a
search and replace with Vista.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
XP itself was *really* an upgrade to NT
and W95.
And Windows 2000/NT Workstation
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Alan: I originally had 512mb and I added 1g. A driver for my onboard
network card was not available and had to purchase one.
Hmm - the driver situation does seem to be a bit of a disaster at the
minute. I think the bulk of businesses and savvy users will wait six
Jeff Johnson wrote:
While the hardware and interface issues are no problem for people like us,
the offer bigger challenges to the people we are developing applications
for.
I suppose after a couple of hours I can find most things in Vista, it
seems to largely be a different interface in
Are you using the latest remote desktop client? There was a new one
released very recently to work when connecting to Vista.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
Consequently it is NOT 100% Windows compliant.
It doesn't necessarily use Windows API controls, that's not the same
thing.
We have had numerous customers over the years running our FPW
application via Citrix and TS, I've never come across this problem.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Have you tried using the browser-based client?
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman
I would also look at this MSKB article, it has details about how to
fiddle with graphic caching settings for the TS client at a lower level.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321706
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox
I knew VB6 applications were supported on Vista, didn't think Visual
Studio 6 itself was, though ...
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT
.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com
Derek Kalweit wrote:
Based on the responses, it seems like most people are working on
non-Fox projects at the moment...
I'm working on a about 3 VFP9 projects, and one ASP.NET/C# project.
In between scratching my ass and looking out the window.
MB Software Solutions wrote:
In your messageboxes, what do you display for the header--the app name,
a one-word description (like Problem, Alert, or Error), or something a
bit more descriptive?
Error in the title plus a stop icon, and some generally descriptive
text, then a Details
One of these usually applies, I find:
http://www.strangeplaces.net/weirdthings/haiku.html
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Some of these suckas would be handy for backing up servers ...
http://www.dabs.com/productview.aspx?quicklinx=3TVB
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
From the comments;
Of course Apple's OS X installs like a dream. It damn well ought to
as they control everything from the hardware through to the packaging
your machine comes in - if it was not easy to install there would be
something very, very wrong. That's one of the benefits of being
Whoops, replied to the wrong one!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
From the comments;
Of course Apple's OS X installs like a dream. It damn well ought to
as they control everything from the hardware through to the packaging
your machine comes in - if it was not easy to install there would be
something very, very wrong. That's one of the benefits of being
I may be having a blonde day but:
VFP9 SP1 application, I have a cursor, produced from a select statement:
select blah into cursor _trans readwrite nofilter
Then table buffering set with:
cursorsetprop(Buffering, 5, _trans)
I then bind that to a grid, and some grid columns have their
Typical, buffer mode should be 4 not 5 ... working now.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
mrgmhale wrote:
The only thing the cartoonist overlooked was the restraint belt system to
prevent an End User from getting out of the Vista Chair after getting into
it.
Also the bit where the chair calls the factory once in a while in case
it's been put in a different house.
I thought that there were significant changes made to the base OS in terms
of security and how the computer interacted with potential threats.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_Vista
There's quite a bit new, including the UAC as mentioned above, and all
the fun stuff
Michael Madigan wrote:
I've been backing up my system since the 26th and it's
only 30% complete.
I have to say if I was doing this I'd be looking for a provider who can
do an initial take-on of data from DVD or tape or something.
___
Post
All we need now is for someone to develop a web-centric scripting
language called Butterfly, then we could have a .NET version called
IronButterfly.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance
and no longer a threat, Microsoft will kill its
version of the language and push the developers into languages that
Microsoft has developed and owns.
Like what happened with Java? Er, no, wait a minute ...
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post
Does running it in Windows XP SP2 compatibility mode help?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
Just posting this so it's out there.
We have a customer running 2 networked VFP apps, one is VFP8, one is
VFP9. They were getting persistent Invalid Seek Offset errors on one
PC. Replaced the PC to no avail.
The server is a Dell Poweredge 2950. This server has a fairly recent
technology
Dave Crozier wrote:
Alan,
You mean you are brave enough to run VOIP and data on the same cable
infrastructure??
Nope, but the customer was. We don't get a say unfortunately!
At least application traffic has a quantifiable burst mode bandwidth which
is never going to be for a long time. On
Tracy Pearson wrote:
And now it's entered as a bug:
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?Feedba
ckID=275450
My Vista laptop is in it's bag but I'll give it a whirl later and let
you know.
___
Post Messages to:
Adam Buckland wrote:
I have found though that Real is better IMHO and takes far less time to
buffer and get going!
The thing is some people such as me still have an aversion to RealPlayer
at a molecular level, due to earlier adware-ridden versions. But wait!
Help is at hand!
Yep, busted for me too:
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n285/ally_b_01/bug.jpg
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L0phtCrack
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo
Or http://ophcrack.sourceforge.net/ if ya want a free one.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com
I've been running FoxPro for Windows, VFP6 and VFP9 on Vista Pro and
have had no issues. The only one I know about is the multilevel context
menu display problem, as discussed on this forum, but I don't use them
so it's not an issue for me.
___
Post
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
EVERYTIME I try and run a program that's not Microsoft, both monitors go
dim and you get a message asking you if you want to allow this program to
run.
Right-click on the shortcut and select 'Run as administrator'. Or use
TweakUAC to make it silent.
Michael Madigan wrote:
I worked for a guy who would re-write anything I would
do.
I hate that. I wouldn't do it to anyone either no matter how crap their
coding style. What I would do is just do any changes to someone's code
in my own style. I think in multiple-developer situations you
On Mon, 7 May 2007 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT), Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
He also collected professional wrestling action
figures.
That should have set alarm bells ringing on its own.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post
http://www.spybot.info/en/news/2007-05-08.html
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
MB Software Solutions wrote:
Look at today--FPD and FPW apps still work and
don't seem to be crapping out anytime soon!
Not exactly the case.
FPW and FPD will run today, but they run in an emulated machine. So
they're isolated from the OS, and will probably be fine until Windows
stops
I think VFP should kick the bucket in the next version.
Wait a minute ...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Dave Crozier wrote:
Bad Bad Alan!
I'll get me coat.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
I always USE IN SELECT(mycursor) as soon as is convenient. Comes from
being a C++ programmer and having to worry about things like freeing up
resources probably.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
I dowloaded the Vista DVD image recently without any problems. From MSDN
subscriber downloads that is.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
mrgmhale wrote:
little paper choplettes.
Hanging chads, surely?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
We've already got one - VB6.
GDR
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
Stephen the Cook wrote:
Hopefully it's a two to three year gig.
I hope you cackled with evil glee?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39636
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
It said you do not have the rights to save in this directory, please choose
another
For me personally, it would take a lot more than that to force me to
reinstall another OS! I think the whole security thing is going to take
a while to shake down into a happy
Tracy Pearson wrote:
Two support techs here bought their own copies from Amazon and were showing
the box off last month or so. Only complaint I have heard is how annoying
the UAC stuff can be.
It's annoying but ... read the instructions people! It doesn't work like
earlier versions of
Just those VERY annoying popups when you try to run things.
There should be an option to turn them off, but I haven't found it yet.
There are many ways.
Right-click on shortcut, select 'Run As Administrator'
Change the shortcut properties to give the program administrator priviliges.
You could change the child form to a form class instead. Then on the
parent form:
Local oChildForm
oChildForm = CreateObject(myChildFormClass)
oChildForm.Show(1)
x1 = oChildForm.Property1 Query a property set when the form
was running
oChildForm.Release()
MB Software Solutions wrote:
But I don't want it to be a modal form. Your example is just that
(since you use the 1 for the Show parameter value).
Well, make the 1 a 2 then.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Richard Kaye wrote:
Thanks for that, Alan. Might I suggest you also may want SCA, MNA, VCA
as well.
What are they ?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
It's late and my head hurts and I can't find an answer anywhere boo hoo.
Anyway:
Define Class MyClass As Custom
Add Object Protected ADODBStream As ADODB.Stream
EndDefine
The above compiles OK but throws a syntax error at runtime. Is it
possible to add an object like that or should I
John Weller wrote:
I use Xzip from http://xstandard.com. Freeware and works like a charm.
Hey, nice one, hadn't seen that before.
I use Craig Boyd's FLL though, because all you have to do is put it in
the same place as the EXE and SET LIBRARY, there's no registration to
worry about.
MB Software Solutions wrote:
g the office, but a quick glance looks like you're using some sort
of DotNot syntax and not the regular VFP syntax. I could be wrong, though!
Well,
x = CreateObject(ADODB.Stream)
works OK ...
___
Post Messages
Christof Wollenhaupt wrote:
Hi Alan,
Add Object Protected ADODBStream As ADODB.Stream
ADODB.Stream is not an ActiveX control and can therefore not be added to a
container. You have to use CREATEOBJECT() and store the reference in a
property.
smacks forehead
Of course.
Ailsom F. Heringer (Osklen) wrote:
Thank You !
Very good and easy to use.
But I could unzip an encrypted zip file (with password) . Is it possible ?
Probably not, because the encryption would be dependent on the software
that created the Zip file. So if you used WinZip and added a
Bill Arnold wrote:
Much thanks for Craig for this valuable contribution!
Much thanks to Craig for *all* his great libraries.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
Is there a quick-n-filthy way to do this?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
Ted Roche wrote:
Well, for a different question, you might get a different answer.
No, no, your first answer was plenty good!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
Thanks all. Well, I should have qualified my question by mentioning that
the server in question is in the US, and I'm in Ireland!
But all those methods would work I presume ...
The core problem is that I'm using SQLXML to return data, then
XMLTOCURSOR in VFP to create a cursor from the data.
On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:52:04 -0400, MB Software Solutions
Your thoughts on UMPC's future?
Same as Tablet PC and voice recognition, i.e. niche.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance
it in a
virtual machine first, then get hold of all the freeware antispyware and
antivirus applications and run them in the virtual machine. But that
still doesn't preclude it having some sort of undetectable rootkit
there.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 20 May 2007 11:07:14 -0500 (CDT), William Sanders / EFG
I'd recommend Telemagic.
Wow, I remember fighting MergeMagic in the very early 1990's.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
What's this? WiFi is going to melt our heads now? Admmit, after we all
narrowly escaped getting fried by mobile phones.
Pffft.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
Well, WIN.INI is certainly still there in Vista, it has to be for 16-bit
application support. I can't vouch for changing the default printer
using the method you mentioned though.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Allen wrote:
there is so much radiation around it cant be that good
for us.
Why is radiation necessarily bad for you? Radiation from electronics
probably has tiny effects. Solar radiation is good for you in
moderation, isn't it?
___
Post Messages
This sort of reminds me about how, in the days of CRT monitors, how we
were all going to die from monitor radiation.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
Jim Dettman wrote:
Who's to say with 100% certainty that monitors have not caused
health problems?
Nobody for sure Jim, but it's the usual perception of risk thing and a
tiny, tiny risk. Everyone in our office once had those smoked-glass
screen covers, yet half of them smoked. The BSE (mad
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/22/wifi_science_bunk/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
If it's breaking unexpectedly it may be due to the datasession being
switched for some reason.
I'd use
set asserts on
assert used(mycursor)
Then when used(mycursor) is .F. you will get a set of choices and you
can continue on if you know it's not in the area you want to be checking.
Paging Mr Crozier, Mr Crozier to the list please ...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
Well, it's the easy criticism I suppose, but in reality the situation is
different I think. ME was obviously a crock. Vista is a good, solid OS
albeit with incomplete driver support so far, and of course the UAC
palaver. The driver support coupled with the fact that there's no
compelling
This is the oT police! Step AWAY from the discussion and put your hands
behind your head!
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Surely asp has something like that ??
Not built in, AFAIK. Oh no! That therefore means that PHP is better than
ASP!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39890
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
Mike yearwood wrote:
It seems
everybody does this:
REPLACE table.field1 with value1, table.field2 with value2
even though
REPLACE field1 with value1, field2 with value2 in table
is the correct and safest way to do it.
Well, no. I use
Begin Transaction
lFailed = .f.
Try
http://paleo-future.blogspot.com/
Scroll down a bit, it's the 'Grey Flannel Navigator' stuff.
Some of it is pretty spot-on. First person to say the interface looks
like Vista gets a slap round the lughole.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Sytze de Boer wrote:
Hi Foxers
This is completely new territory for me and I hope someone can help
Client has given a XSL file and an XML file
The XSL file is referred to as a schema file
How can I convert a small dbf file to XML file ?
Do I need the XSL file to do this ?
Look at the
I've been playing Quake for years. Where do I sign up?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable
A new language developed by cats.
http://lolcode.com/home
Rather unusual, here's Hello World:
HAI
CAN HAS STDIO?
VISIBLE HAI WORLD!
KTHXBYE
Notice the 'HAI' and the start, and the 'KTHXBYE' to indicate program
termination.
Here we see AWSUM THX ... O NOES structured error handling, similar
It's the way of the future ...
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/65
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
MB Software Solutions wrote:
I don't get that same feeling. I see this as a kewl thing but not
practical for regular mass usage.
I think it'll find many applications, like in the design and CAD world,
but will remain too expensive for say mass deployment in offices for a
long time.
Derek Kalweit wrote:
I don't see this dominating
anywhere keyboards are used much anytime soon...
Well, did you watch the link that I posted? That system just draws a
keyboard and you can drag it around, resize it etc ... just think, you
could have a different layout for work and games.
Derek Kalweit wrote:
Cocktail arcade machines, I think they called them.
The sit-down variety of video games that were common in the 80's were
called cocktail cabinets, yeah. Somehow I think the technology involved
here won't be suited to the sort of abuse it could expect in a pub!
Beer,
They are based in Somerset; there must be free cider ;-)
Mmmm. Free proper zider. Full of bird's beaks and twigs etc
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
Dan Olsson wrote:
and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
entire system? ;)
on whether the above is the most important thing
to you is the development environment.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:33:46 +0100, Andy Davies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
exactly what was said about .net v1, and v2 was a re-learning exercise.
There is no (ongoing) money in selling a stable platform!
.NET is free. As are the entry-level versions of the various dev tools.
--
Alan Bourke
Older version not supported any more! More news at 10!
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com
The only thing I've ever come across is that the recommended approach
for using configuration files was deprecated in 2.0. It will still work,
it'll just throw up warnings when you compile it. Granted, they did
replace the old way with an overly complicated method as well.
--
Alan Bourke
You may find that the functionality in VFP to read XML can't handle
very deeply nested schemas.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
With these tools I can build a
web site without the need of writing a single line of java code.
Netbeans visual web plugin allows me to create web pages by dragging and
dropping objects onto the designer frame and then filling out a property
sheets on the
501 - 600 of 4142 matches
Mail list logo
