Re: HTTPS GET using Winsock

2023-04-05 Thread Man-wai Chang
Thanks! I am afraid ActiveX might vanish in future versions of Windows. But then, Foxpro is still 32-bit and basically English-only. :) On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:56 PM Tracy Pearson wrote: > > I have used the MSXML ActiveX control in the past. > > LOCAL xml as MSXML2.XMLHTTP60 > xml =

Re: HTTPS GET using Winsock

2023-04-05 Thread Man-wai Chang
I suppose I could do more using Winsock, maybe in the future... :) On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:58 PM Alan Bourke wrote: > > Via Winsock specifically ? Why complicate it? > > > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > [excessive quoting removed by server]

Re: HTTPS GET using Winsock

2023-04-03 Thread Alan Bourke
Via Winsock specifically ? Why complicate it? -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

RE: HTTPS GET using Winsock

2023-04-03 Thread Tracy Pearson
I have used the MSXML ActiveX control in the past. LOCAL xml as MSXML2.XMLHTTP60 xml = CREATEOBJECT("MSXML2.XMLHTTP.6.0") xml.open("GET","https://www.google.com;) xml.send() ?xml.status,xml.statusText * ?xml.responseText These days I do use the Chilkat ActiveX control,