+1
And Free - a double bonus!
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: 21 October 2016 22:06
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Speeding up a Powershell script
+1 to RegexBuddy.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech
+1 to RegexBuddy.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:43 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Speeding up a Powershell script
My view ... RegExp syntax is fairly limited in scope
it highly !!
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Edward
Leafe
Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2016 7:36 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Speeding up a Powershell script
On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.
On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>> +1. It's like the UberNerds who want to obfuscate just for the "fun" of it
>> to be UberNerds. I felt similar about RegExp.
>
> Regexes can be great, but I resist the temptation to make long regexes.
> That gets
At 05:01 2016-10-21, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2016-10-19 09:43, Malcolm Greene wrote:
A great use case for getting your feet wet with Python.
BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel
the same way?
I guess I just do not have your
Powershell is "obectized" batch files. Your nerd status is reduced when
you diss objects like that.
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Remove-Windows-Store-Apps-a00ef4a4
because powershell is very cool. I have 25-30 scripts that I run monthly
for a variety of odd reasons.
On 2016-10-19 09:43, Malcolm Greene wrote:
A great use case for getting your feet wet with Python.
BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel
the same way?
Malcolm
+1. It's like the UberNerds who want to obfuscate just for the "fun" of
it to be UberNerds. I
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> I hope you didn't take the comment as disrespectful as It wasn't meant to be
> in any way at all ;-)
Of course not. It's easier to do it in Visual Foxpro!
> I must admit that Powershell is a little like Regular
On 2016-10-19 10:31, Peter Cushing wrote:
On 19/10/2016 14:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
Or:
for i in $(find . -type f | perl -ne 'print $1 if m/\.([^.\/]+)$/' |
sort -u); do echo "$i"": ""$(du -hac **/*."$i" | tail -n1 | awk
'{print $1;}')"; done | sort -h -k 2 -r
Assuming you have extglob
Well, I suppose if I wanted a console program, I could have used
FP-DOS, though SYS(2000) and FSIZE() instead of ADIR().
But I have a SQL-queryable cursor and can use the report writer or
textmerge to produce output in the format desired.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Man-wai Chang
It is .NET for the command line. You ask specific commandlets to get data
for you and then iterate through it. In this case you are making a new
container object to hold the "new look" as I vaguely remember.
Currently in my own SharePoint hell of an upgrade that duped all list
contents in 2013
then the learning or re-learning curve is huge!
Hope you found a solution anyway.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
Sent: 20 October 2016 14:35
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: Re: Speeding up a Powershell script
I ac
I actually wrote and compiled a console C program to do it using VS 2013 Pro. :)
https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/scripting/dire/dire-20161020.zip?attredirects=0=1
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> 30 lines in VFP. As a bonus, you end up with a cursor
Powershell does not have awk and find. Are you using portable Ubuntu
in Windows 10?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Linux:
>
> find . -type f -printf "%f %s\n" |
> awk '{
> PARTSCOUNT=split( $1, FILEPARTS, "." );
> EXTENSION=PARTSCOUNT
For the record:
I speak Cantonese and it is quite different from both Mandarin
(Taiwan) and Putonghua (Beijing)!
And the PLA army speaks Putonghua. :)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> For a moment I thought the script was written in Mandarin!
>
It's native query language is definitely not 100% basic ANSI SQL ...
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> A great use case for getting your feet wet with Python.
>
> BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel
> the same way?
--
30 lines in VFP. As a bonus, you end up with a cursor of data, and an
on-topic thread!
CREATE CURSOR curFiles (filesPK int NOT NULL autoinc, extension c(12),
totalsize I)
INDEX on extension TAG extension
lnResult = recurse()
WAIT WINDOW NOWAIT "Completed counting " + TRANSFORM(lnResult) + "
On 19/10/2016 14:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
Or:
for i in $(find . -type f | perl -ne 'print $1 if m/\.([^.\/]+)$/' | sort -u); do echo "$i"":
""$(du -hac **/*."$i" | tail -n1 | awk '{print $1;}')"; done | sort -h -k 2 -r
Assuming you have extglob enabled:
shopt -s extglob
Feck me Dave, what
ge-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 19 October 2016 14:50
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: Speeding up a Powershell script
Linux:
find . -type f -printf "%f %s\n" |
awk '{
PARTSCOUNT=split( $1, F
LETYPE_MAP[FILETYPE], FILETYPE;
}
}' | sort -n
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
Sent: 18 October 2016 06:45
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: Speeding up a Powershell script
The follo
] On Behalf Of Malcolm Greene
Sent: 19 October 2016 14:43
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Speeding up a Powershell script
A great use case for getting your feet wet with Python.
BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel the same
way?
Malcolm
[excessive quoting removed
> BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel
> the same way?
Yeah, I've never liked it. Super powerful but far too wordy.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
A great use case for getting your feet wet with Python.
BTW: Powershell syntax wants me to gouge my eyes out. Anyone else feel
the same way?
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Last resort! :)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Do it in native VFP ...
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Do it in native VFP ...
>
> Dave
>
+1!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
Do it in native VFP ...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
Sent: 18 October 2016 06:45
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: Speeding up a Powershell script
The following Powershell script aims to
The following Powershell script aims to count and calculate file sizes
of each unique file extension in the current folder recursively.
How would you speed up this script for a folder with over 17 entries?
The problem is the following two statements being repeated for each
unique file
27 matches
Mail list logo